12-10-2012, 07:09 PM
Lemkin,
The ad homs are disgraceful. I am not going to go into a long winded technical description of what anyone can see if the look closely. These motions are not explosions, but highly energetic as would be expected when such massive structures collapse.
A collapse which involves the communition of hundreds of thousands of tons of concrete, wall board and other building contents will release enormous about of heat from friction. That heat raised the temperature of the debris and the debris pile did act like a huge heat sink holding trillions of calories of heat for months... which slowly radiated into the atmosphere and the ground.
I don't know the precise cause of the extreme heat seen in some locations. I don't think it is beyond the realm of possibility that thermitic (exothermic) reactions were CREATED by the mixing of ground building laterals, in the presence of enormous pressure, water, heat and even fire. All of the substances which are used in thermite were present in the building... iron, aluminum, sulfur. Kevin Ryan produced thermite in his back yard with some beakers of these chemicals.
There is little to no evidence of melted steel... a few samples of eutectic burning in rather thin sections... not massive core columns. While this is very unusual and needs to be properly explained, these examples hardly would cause the towers to collapse.
I do not accept the official technical explanation, nor do I accept the political analysis. My present postion is more of a LIHOP than a MIHOP which still puts the officials in the hot seat.
I suggest you spend some time reading http://www.sharpprintinginc.com/911/ which is written by a scientist... so you should be able to appreciate the rigor with which he approaches the evidence.
I am neither a foil nor do a hold a brief for the big lie. I'd be delighted to speak with Mark Gaffney.
The ad homs are disgraceful. I am not going to go into a long winded technical description of what anyone can see if the look closely. These motions are not explosions, but highly energetic as would be expected when such massive structures collapse.
A collapse which involves the communition of hundreds of thousands of tons of concrete, wall board and other building contents will release enormous about of heat from friction. That heat raised the temperature of the debris and the debris pile did act like a huge heat sink holding trillions of calories of heat for months... which slowly radiated into the atmosphere and the ground.
I don't know the precise cause of the extreme heat seen in some locations. I don't think it is beyond the realm of possibility that thermitic (exothermic) reactions were CREATED by the mixing of ground building laterals, in the presence of enormous pressure, water, heat and even fire. All of the substances which are used in thermite were present in the building... iron, aluminum, sulfur. Kevin Ryan produced thermite in his back yard with some beakers of these chemicals.
There is little to no evidence of melted steel... a few samples of eutectic burning in rather thin sections... not massive core columns. While this is very unusual and needs to be properly explained, these examples hardly would cause the towers to collapse.
I do not accept the official technical explanation, nor do I accept the political analysis. My present postion is more of a LIHOP than a MIHOP which still puts the officials in the hot seat.
I suggest you spend some time reading http://www.sharpprintinginc.com/911/ which is written by a scientist... so you should be able to appreciate the rigor with which he approaches the evidence.
I am neither a foil nor do a hold a brief for the big lie. I'd be delighted to speak with Mark Gaffney.