Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Michael Piper and Final Judgment
You need to read Final Judgment to realize how what I'vealready explained precludes any need to discuss specious weapons lists. Yourentry is regressive and doesn't recognize how what I wrote precludes it.
What Piper does is show how CIA used the power and politicalinterests of both Israel and the jewish treasurers of the US syndicate tocreate a shadow government based on the relationship CIA established with theUS mafia under their Operation Underworld.
It sounds to me as if you are sayingthat this "syndicate", this "shadow government" was not already in existence. That the Rothschild/Morgan/Rockefeller SHADOWGOVERNMENT that controlled economics and politics since before the turn of the20[SUP]th[/SUP] century with involvement in whatever you want to call the US UNDERWORLD AND MIC of the time. JEWISH& European bankers and their representatives had been doing this to thecountries of Europe for centuries… yetall of a sudden, you think that the CIA, the Mafia and the Bankers createdsomething NEW? In the mid 20[SUP]th[/SUP] century? Please Albert… it's as if you;ve dismissedhistory up to the creation of the NEW cabal… when in reality it was the SOSdifferent day, different name… if you have not read "None Dare Call It Conspiracy" - you might - it provides the background for this cabal and the influences on US and world politics... in 1907, when Morgan and the Rothschilds help create the Panic

"The lesson of the Panic of 1907 was clear, though not for some six years was it destined to be embodied in legislation: the United States gravely needed a central banking system…"
"This act establishes the most gigantic trust on earth… When the President signs this act the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust investigation, will be legalized…"

JFK and Israel's bomb may have played a part years later... but please stop trying to convince me or anyone else that this situation was the product the mid 20th century when it startyed in the late 1700's.

This relationship was reformed with a new Israel-basedcenter during Kennedy's administration. While the persons surrounding theDallas conspiracy were Cuba-oriented, the funding network was solidlyassociated with Israel and the mob's jewish treasurers headed by ardent zionistMeyer Lansky. You can't wiggle out of this because it's all based in fact.
So the oil money about as far fromJews as it gets - could not have been the funding source for the JFK assassination…. And I did transpose Cuba & JFK, my bad,sorry. I meant that Echevarria's commentwas exclusively about Cuba, NOT JFK.
I am not wiggling nor trying Albertand I really wish you would not make this personal… I am attempting to understand your positionas you've developed it from reading Piper and other research… That I have not accepted it hook/line/sinkerdoes not mean I disagree… I have notread Piper, yet have ready MANY, MANY itemson the subject… Killing JFK was PART ofa plan, not ALL of the plan… He waskilled for very specific reasons and while I see that Bloomfield was involvedin the financing, there were MANY SOURCES of funds… I have yet to see the connection betweenBloomfield and the assassination itself.
I personally don'tbuy this "everybody had a little share of the blame" excuse becauseall the other groups you cite didn't disproportionately benefit from theresult. If you look at Israel it was the main beneficiary of Kennedy'sassassination and CIA dovetailed its power along with them.
Really? The Vietnam war and ALL is militaryexpenditures PLUS the removal of the French/Corsican drug trade to place theUS/SE Asia drug trade squarely in control with its BILLIONS in profit goinginto the coffers of those who ran it were NOT the main benefactors… LBJ,becomes president NOT a benefactor, Hoover keeps power not a benefactor… Do you honestly believe that Israel and theUSA would not have continued on their path as allies with Israel receivingBILLIONS/TRILLIONS $$ had JFK not been assassinated? Have you read JFK and the UNSPEAKABLE? JFK threatened the entire way the WORLD ELITE didbusiness and how the WORLD ELITE controls its masses… I am sorry Albert, but to make this about Israel and Israel only is imo,very near-sighted.
What you are doing, David, is pointing to all the suspectswhile one has a giant bag of loot over their shoulder and trying to sell thateach one had a little part. Israel is now the US military's reason d'etre andthe main focus of their power efforts is right in line with Israel.
None of those other equal share culprits you cite has themost powerful lobby in history sitting in the middle of the US governmentcorrupting it out of its democracy. There's no argument, as Piper correctlypoints out, that the point of origin of this Israeli power is the Kennedyassassination and the assumption of CIA power that followed.
Sorry, but I disagree with yourconclusion. The corruption of the USAdid not begin in 1947/48… Was theregreat and tremendous power behind the creation of the Israel state and the "jews"of the world in its support especially the USA… of course. I disagree that the POINT OF ORIGIN of Israel'spower is the JFK assassination…
The correct definition of that increase in power is more nuancedand finessed than your oversimplified version provides. Piper describes it indetail and so far no credible assassination researcher has bothered to refutehim via the facts.
Albert we get already that you area Piper disciple… that whatever he says is golden and the only truth worthdiscussing… Since you have read and memorized the book if you could expand on the following list as to what FACTS you'd like refuted… I will look into them.


In the pages of "Final Judgment" the Israeliconnection to the JFK assassination is explored in frightening--and fullydocumented--detail. For example, did you know:
* That JFK was engaged in a bitter secret conflict withIsrael over U.S. East policy and that Israel's prime minister resigned indisgust, saying JFK's stance threatened Israel's very survival?
* That JFK's successor, Lyndon Johnson, immediately reversedAmerica's policy toward Israel?
* That the top Mafia figures often alleged to be behind theJFK assassination were only front men for Meyer Lansky?
* That the CIA's liaison to the Mossad, James Angleton, was aprime mover behind the cover-up of the JFK assassination?
The facts are what count here, David, and so far, includingyourself, no one has managed to touch them. In the end, what is painfullyobvious is -that- is what counts the most and everything else is just excuses.Your "guns don't kill people, people do" viewpoint above doesn'taccount for Britain's unusually low gun murder rate.
What I said was "ORGANIZATIONS DON'TKILL PEOPLE, PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE" so please if you're going to quote me do itcorrectly. "But Organizations do not accomplish thesethings.. people do" and as I asked… listadditional FACTS that Piper offers that convinces you of the connection…
Evidence that is OBVIOUS to youstill needs authentication and corroboration… there is no argument that the connection and ideologies were/arethere. That money moved thru this systemand that some of the KEY players are right there for the observation.
And for you to suggest that Israel simply took advantage of"the outcome" insults all the information Piper provides to show howdeeply they were involved via that CIA/mob Swiss bank underground in advance.Israel was too directly connected to both Clay Shaw's Permindex; Angleton'snuclear smuggling behind JFK's back, and also the CIA's promise of continuedfunding through that dirty Swiss bank network to not be involved.
And THIS is the crux of the matter… after all the OBVIOUS EVIDENCE yourconclusion is stated as a theory, an hypothesis… "with all these connection and coincidencesand personnel HOW CAN THE ISRAELI'S NOT BE INVOLVED… "involved" is not the same as planned andauthored Albert… and I really don't mind"insulting" Piper's research and information as I have yet to AUTHENTICATE ANDCORROBORATE it, or see you do it…
If Piper offered documentation thatshows Bloomfield ordered anything, or organized anything.. love to see it. Putting all the eggs into Piper's basket,again, seems near-sighted to me.
You can't ignore the power and influence the zionist lobbyhad on the framework and funding source of that underground government throughthe Lansky/Rosenbaum/Mossad connection. That's the elephant!
Again Albert… are you really sayingthat this was the one and only funding source for this Underground Government that if it wasn't the Jews of the USA/Israel there was no threat to JFK?
You seem to be IGNORING every otherplayer in the game and are fixated on it being Piper's way or no way…. While YOU may be there, I and many others,are not…
So I will go back to the question… why do you believe that Echevarria's commenthad to do ONLY with the JFK assassination and not the Cuban situation instead given the timing and the actual weapons he was dealing with?

I went out and did a little research on Permindex

Seems to me Albert, that Permindexwas a bit more than Bloomfield, Jews, and Mafia…. And the long article that follows on themdoes not even include the letters "JEW" unless speaking of Nagy's friend (seebold below) Given what he did to thejews, you don't find the FOUNDER of PERMINDEX a bit of an affront to any JEWwho knew what he did?
Initial BoardMembers on the Swiss incorporation papers in 1958:[SUP][9][/SUP] http://ce399fascism.wordpress.com/2010/08/05/the-origins-of-permindex/
After [Clay] Shaw's arrest, Jim Garrison received from RalphSchoenman, philosopher Bertrand Russell's secretary in London, copies of a series of articles published inan Italian newspaper of the independent left called Paesa Sera. The articleshad been assigned six months earlier to expose the CIA's pernicious attempt toinfluence European electoral politics and to thwart the democratic process inmore than one country. They focused on Centro Mondiale Commerciale,' the worldtrade center in Rome, as a CIA front, one modeled, according to a 1958 StateDepartment document, on the original CIA-created International Trade Mart inNew Orleans. Paese Sera, of course, did not possess this document. Its evidencecame first hand.
Contro Mondiale Commerciale was, by the US government's ownadmission, a CIA front, channeling money not only into legal political parties,but also into right-wing movements. Among them was the virulent paramilitaryOAS (Organisation Armée Secrète) in France, which employed terrorism to opposethe independence of Algeria, and was among the most notorious fascistorganizations in French history.' In New Orleans, Guy Banister and L.P. Davishad been OAS supporters.
The most notorious OAS-sponsored effort was the attemptedassassination of Charles de Gaulle in 1962. Banister operative Tommy Baumlerremarked that those who killed John F. Kennedy were those who wanted to killde Gaulle.' He was referring to the CIA,Clay Shaw, Banister, and Centro's parent organization, PERMINDEX (PermanentIndustrial Exhibition), based in Switzerland.
Having been accused of shady speculation' by the Swiss,PERMINDEX had created the Centro Mondiale Commerciale in Rome, ostensibly todevelop industry and trade in Italy. The Centro, however, was a tradeassociation that rarely if ever organized an exhibit; it facilitated nocommercial transactions.
CIA had, in fact, founded PERMINDEX to organize itspolitical policymaking. In Italy, this had meant opposition to a coalition ofsocialists and communists that would have resulted in a majority government. TheCIA preferred the Christian Democratic Party and so CIA Counter Intelligence chief James Angletonfiltered ten million dollars of CIA money to the Christian Democrats. In LesEchos newspaper, de Gaulle namedPERMINDEX as having been involved in the attempt on his life. The French, noless than the Italians, considered PERMINDEX a subsidiary of the CIA.' PaeseSera would call PERMINDEX a creatureof the CIA…set up as a cover for the transfer of CIA funds in Italy for illegalpolitical espionage activities.'
In the ranks ofPERMINDEX were actual Nazis and neo-Nazis, terrorists and Mafia operatives.Typical was Prince Guterez di Spadafora, a former Mussolini undersecretary,whose son had married the daughter of Hitler's finance minister, Hjalmar Schact,tried for war crimes at Nuremberg. The leadership of PERMINDEX included along-time asset of CIA Deputy Direct of Plans, Frank Wisner. His name wasFerenc Nagy, and he was the president of PERMINDEX. Nagy had been chairman ofthe Hungarian's People's Party' or Independent Party of Small Holders.' Briefly, in 1945, he had beenprime minister of Hungary. But it was Nagy's CIA history that catapulted him tothe leadership of PERMINDEX. Its general secretary, Bela Kovacs, was also a CIAasset. Kovacs had been arrested by the Soviet security police and charged withspying for a Western intelligence service.'
Nagy had been onFrank Wisner's list of the individuals with whom his office would havedealings in connection with our authorized activities' since September 22,1948. Wisner then had been Assistant Director of CIA as well as AssistantDirector for Policy Coordination.' Nagy had been a cleared contact of theInternational Organizations Division of the Agency,' among Wisner's mosttrusted Eastern European contacts.
Nagy's history withthe CIA dates from its beginnings and links to PERMINDEX with the Agency'sclandestine services. Confirming de Gaulle's thesis that PERMINDEX funded theOAS is that Nagy was a munificent contributer' to Jacques Soustelle, former professor at the École pratique des hautesétudes and former Algerian governor general. Soustelle became an OASsupporters, and his organization, Conseil national de la resistance, was allbut identical to OAS. In 1960, Soustelle met in Washington, D.C., with RichardBissell, then heading the CIA's clandestine services. A year later, Soustellewent into exile to avoid being arrested by de Gaulle's police. Two years afterthat he would be accused of colluding with OAS in the attempted assassinationof de Gaulle. S Soustelle had openly advocated over throwing de Gualle,' whilecondoning OAS violence.
In New Orleans,Delphine Roberts identified Nagy from his photograph as someone she had seen atGuy Banister's office.
Nagy'spartner in the leadership of PERMINDEX was Giorgio Mantello, aka George Mandel,who during World War II had traded in Jewishrefugees, profiting handsomely from theirmisery from his perch at the consulate of El Salvador in Bern. It was Mandel who had been the official founderof PERMINDEX. CIA kept silent, but the State Department learned that, asGeorges Mandel,' Mantello had been engaged in the wartime Jewish refugee racket' until he was expelled from Switzerland.
Although Centro Mondiale Commerciale refused to reveal theorigins of its vast income, the paper trail leads to a Miami bank, AstaldeVaduz, and to the CIA front Double-Chek.' CMC was connected as well to L.M.Bloomfield in Montreal, and to the Seligman banking family in Basel; Seligmanbanking in turn was allied with Sullivan and Cromwell, the law firm of CIADirector of Central Intelligence, Allen Dulles. My parents are very interestedin PERMINDEX,' Peter Seligman-Schurch wrote to Clay Shaw.

In Switzerland, PERMINDEX soon aroused widespread public suspicion.'Nagy and Seligman stonewalled the concerned American consulate in Bern afterthe Swiss complained they had insufficient confidence in the businessintegrity' of PERMINDEX.
In the spring of1958, Enrico Mantello, the vice president of PERMINDEX and brother of Giorgio,visited New Orleans. Touring the Trade Mart, he invited Clay Shaw to join theboard of directors as a means of defusing the criticism of PERMINDEX; itscritics by now included the State Department itself. Nagy appeared at the AmericanEmbassy in Rome to announce that he intended to strengthen US control inPERMINDEX by adding to its Board of Directors a Mr. Shaw, who is in charge ofthe New Orleans, Louisiana permanent exhibit.'
Nagy claimed that Shaw had from the outset great interestin the PERMINDEX project,' and Shaw did use the term delighted' in his cableof acceptance. He made plans to visit Italy, then canceled. despite Mantello'surgings. When he added his PERMINDEX directorship to Who's Who in the Southand the Southeast,' the Department of Commerce warned Shaw about this shadowyorganization.' But, as in all his CIA assignments, grateful for the career CIAmade of him, Clay Shaw honored his obligation.
Internal evidencethat PERMINDEX was a CIA front emerges in the fact that the CIA includedPERMINDEX materials in its asset Clay Shaw's files, three years before as wellas after the Kennedy assassination. One of these documents, dated March 16,1967, reveals that at the time of his arrest Clay Shaw was working withDomestic Operations Division of the CIA's clandestine services. This was only aseeming contradiction since the CIA's operational component in New Orleans hadresided under the umbrella of the Domestic Contact Division, at least sinceNovember 19, 1964, according to a CIA document on Garrison and the KennedyAssassination,' MEMORANDUM No.8.
Most of us considerthe CIA with abhorrence,' Shaw wrote in his Diary for the record, with hiscustomary dark laughter.
In 1962, CentroMondiale Commerciale was expelled from Italy, ostensibly for financialmalfeasance, and specious real estate dealings, but actually for subversion andillegal intelligence activity. Who was giving money to the CMC and what was itbeing used for?' Paesa Sera demanded. PERMINDEX relocated to a more compatiblepolitical venue, apartheid South Africa. Clay Shaw remained on its board,providing space at the Trade Mart for a permanent PERMINDEX display.
The editors of PaeseSera were astonished when their March 1967 publication date for the series onPERMINDEX coincided with the arrest of Clay Shaw. They had been working on theseries for months, former editor Giorgio Fanti says. Now they headlined Clay Shaw'sinvolvement in PERMINDEX, with a subhead revealing that he had been arrested byJim Garrison in New Orleans. Paese Sera noted that Shaw's name had firstappeared in connection with the machinations of the organization. He had goneto Rome during the time preceding the disbanding of the CMC,' Shaw admitted toa Paesa Sera interviewer. Paesa Sera wondered, too, about Shaw's leaving theUnited States two days after the assassination, remaining abroad for two yearswith only intermittent visits to America.

Shaw affected his customary disdain. He had agreed to be onthe PEMINDEX board, he claimed, because a young Italian came to see me in NewOrleans and told me about a world trade center that was being planned in Rome.'He also told the Paese Sera interviewer that he accepted the position inexchange for two New Orleans-Rome air tickets.' Even his closest friends wereappalled. There must have been blackmail they're very famous for that, theCIA,' Patricia Chandler says.
Jim Garrison had charged that the CIA had plotted theassassination of John F. Kennedy, for which they were aided and abetted in NewOrleans by their operative, Clay Shaw. Thirty-five years later, a series ofattacks on Paese Sera began to appear, accompanied by an excoriation of JimGarrison. Among the publications sanctioning these attacks was the CIA's ownweb site, Studies in Intelligence.' Journalist Max Holland repeated in aseries of magazine articles the erroneous thesis that the only reason thatPaese Sera believed that the CIA was behind PERMINDEX was that the newspaperwas the victim of KGB disinformation. Jim Garrison, therefore, had connectedthe CIA to the Kennedy assassination and to Shaw only owing to a KGB lie.
Rather, Garrison's attribution of the planning of theassassination to the CIA was based on his discovery of the CIA connections ofLee Harvey Oswald, and not those of Clay Shaw, an inconvenient detail Hollandomits. The truth is that Garrison had focused on the CIA in December 1966 and January 1967, well before the Marchpublication of the Paese Sera articles.


Finally, here is the letter from JFK he was concerned over nukes being created… he wanted thorough inspections andto be on the same page as the Israeli's… THIS is what sets off the chain reaction to kill JFK??

JFK's Concern Over Israel's Nuclear Bomb Program
JFK's Letter To Israeli PM Eshkol July 5, 1963

Dear Mr. Prime Minister (Eshkol),
It gives me great personal pleasureto extend congratulations as you assume your responsibilities as Prime Ministerof Israel. You have our friendship and best wishes in your new tasks. It is onone of these that I am writing you at this time.
You are aware, I am sure, of theexchange which I had with Prime Minister Ben-Gurion concerning American visits(ie: inspections -ed) to Israel's nuclear facility at Dimona. Most recently,the Prime Minister wrote to me on May 27. His words reflected a most intensepersonal consideration of a problem that I know is not easy for yourGovernment, as it is not for mine. We welcomed the former Prime Minister'sstrong reaffirmation that Dimona will be devoted exclusively to peacefulpurposes and the reaffirmation also of Israel's willingness to permit periodicvisits (ie: inspections -ed) to Dimona.
I regret having to add to yourburdens so soon after your assumption of office, but I feel the crucialimportance of this problem necessitates my taking up with you at this earlydate certain further considerations, arising out of Mr. Ben-Gurion's May 27letter, as to the nature and scheduling of such visits.
I am sure you will agree that thesevisits should be as nearly as possible in accord with international standards,thereby resolving all doubts as to the peaceful intent of the Dimona project.As I wrote Mr. Ben-Gurion, this Government's commitment to and support ofIsrael could be seriously jeopardized if it should be thought that we wereunable to obtain reliable information on a subject as vital to the peace as thequestion of Israel's effort in the nuclear field.
Therefore, I asked our scientiststo review the alternative schedules of visits we and you had proposed. IfIsrael's purposes are to be clear beyond reasonable doubt, I believe that theschedule which would best serve our common purposes would be a visit early thissummer, another visit in June 1964, and thereafter at intervals of six months.I am sure that such a schedule should not cause you any more difficulty thanthat which Mr. Ben-Gurion proposed in his May 27 letter. It would be essential,and I understand that Mr. Ben-Gurion's letter was in accord with this, that ourscientist have access to all areas of the Dimona site and to any related partof the complex, such as fuel fabrication facilities or plutonium separationplant, and that sufficient time to be allotted for a thorough examination.
Knowing that you fully appreciatethe truly vital significance of this matter to the future well-being of Israel,to the United States, and internationally, I am sure our carefully consideredrequest will have your most sympathetic attention.
Sincerely,
John F. Kennedy


Messages In This Thread
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 22-06-2012, 06:16 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 23-06-2012, 01:45 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 24-06-2012, 01:37 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 24-06-2012, 01:48 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 25-06-2012, 03:00 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 25-06-2012, 03:13 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 25-06-2012, 03:28 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 25-06-2012, 09:41 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 25-06-2012, 10:13 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 25-06-2012, 11:41 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 25-06-2012, 03:34 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 25-06-2012, 03:46 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 25-06-2012, 03:59 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 26-06-2012, 02:54 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 26-06-2012, 04:45 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 26-06-2012, 04:57 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 26-06-2012, 05:13 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 26-06-2012, 05:25 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 26-06-2012, 05:42 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 26-06-2012, 06:00 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 26-06-2012, 06:06 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 26-06-2012, 06:25 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 26-06-2012, 06:28 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 26-06-2012, 06:41 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 26-06-2012, 08:37 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Ed Jewett - 26-06-2012, 09:32 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 27-06-2012, 05:24 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-06-2012, 02:39 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-06-2012, 03:26 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-06-2012, 03:32 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-06-2012, 05:50 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-06-2012, 08:31 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-06-2012, 10:29 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-06-2012, 10:37 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-06-2012, 11:16 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-06-2012, 02:15 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-06-2012, 03:14 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 28-06-2012, 09:25 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 29-06-2012, 05:34 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 29-06-2012, 05:52 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 29-06-2012, 06:00 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 29-06-2012, 10:17 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 29-06-2012, 03:11 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 29-06-2012, 10:18 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 30-06-2012, 10:39 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 30-06-2012, 10:58 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 01-07-2012, 08:41 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Bill Kelly - 14-09-2012, 10:35 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 04-10-2012, 11:11 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 04-10-2012, 11:12 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 05-10-2012, 10:39 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 05-10-2012, 10:51 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 05-10-2012, 03:25 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 05-10-2012, 11:09 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 05-10-2012, 11:26 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 05-10-2012, 11:32 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 06-10-2012, 08:03 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 06-10-2012, 10:54 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 06-10-2012, 11:21 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 06-10-2012, 02:24 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 06-10-2012, 02:31 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 06-10-2012, 02:41 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 06-10-2012, 09:44 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 07-10-2012, 05:34 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 07-10-2012, 08:35 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 07-10-2012, 08:48 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 07-10-2012, 10:46 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 08-10-2012, 09:32 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 10-10-2012, 08:46 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 10-10-2012, 10:26 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 11-10-2012, 01:34 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 11-10-2012, 11:26 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 11-10-2012, 09:59 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 12-10-2012, 08:04 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 12-10-2012, 08:14 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by David Josephs - 12-10-2012, 07:51 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 17-10-2012, 10:02 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 17-10-2012, 10:37 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 20-10-2012, 02:01 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 20-10-2012, 02:08 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 20-10-2012, 02:31 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-10-2012, 02:15 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 22-10-2012, 08:15 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 23-10-2012, 12:37 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 23-10-2012, 01:27 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 24-10-2012, 07:42 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 25-10-2012, 08:46 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 26-10-2012, 09:04 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 26-10-2012, 10:44 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 26-10-2012, 11:32 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 26-10-2012, 10:24 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 26-10-2012, 10:33 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 27-10-2012, 03:32 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 27-10-2012, 04:00 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 27-10-2012, 04:26 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 27-10-2012, 04:44 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 27-10-2012, 05:05 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-10-2012, 01:48 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-10-2012, 02:39 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-10-2012, 02:41 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-10-2012, 03:44 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-10-2012, 06:10 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-10-2012, 06:35 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-10-2012, 07:13 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-10-2012, 08:04 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-10-2012, 08:29 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-10-2012, 08:55 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 28-10-2012, 09:21 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 28-10-2012, 09:47 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 29-10-2012, 03:39 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 29-10-2012, 10:18 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 29-10-2012, 11:48 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 30-10-2012, 01:01 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 30-10-2012, 09:04 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 30-10-2012, 09:12 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 30-10-2012, 09:41 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 30-10-2012, 10:25 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 30-10-2012, 11:44 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 30-10-2012, 09:04 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 31-10-2012, 09:07 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 31-10-2012, 09:38 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 31-10-2012, 10:12 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 31-10-2012, 10:28 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 31-10-2012, 11:20 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 01-11-2012, 08:19 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 01-11-2012, 11:36 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 01-11-2012, 12:16 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 01-11-2012, 12:36 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 01-11-2012, 09:32 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 02-11-2012, 07:21 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 03-11-2012, 04:14 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 03-11-2012, 04:28 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 03-11-2012, 04:50 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 03-11-2012, 03:15 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 03-11-2012, 04:34 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 03-11-2012, 11:37 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 04-11-2012, 03:57 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 04-11-2012, 10:33 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 04-11-2012, 12:40 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 04-11-2012, 10:14 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 04-11-2012, 11:17 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 04-11-2012, 11:33 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 05-11-2012, 07:28 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 05-11-2012, 11:40 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 06-11-2012, 12:17 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 06-11-2012, 12:59 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 06-11-2012, 01:06 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 06-11-2012, 11:33 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 06-11-2012, 10:28 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 06-11-2012, 10:28 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 06-11-2012, 10:54 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 06-11-2012, 11:00 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 07-11-2012, 04:48 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 07-11-2012, 04:55 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 07-11-2012, 11:25 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 07-11-2012, 12:28 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 07-11-2012, 01:06 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 07-11-2012, 01:23 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 08-11-2012, 01:07 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 08-11-2012, 01:34 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 08-11-2012, 10:22 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 09-11-2012, 03:00 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 09-11-2012, 01:39 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by LR Trotter - 09-11-2012, 06:28 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 09-11-2012, 10:49 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 10-11-2012, 11:05 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 10-11-2012, 11:32 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 10-11-2012, 11:58 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 10-11-2012, 10:28 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 11-11-2012, 01:28 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 11-11-2012, 02:23 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 11-11-2012, 01:55 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 11-11-2012, 02:08 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 11-11-2012, 02:19 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 11-11-2012, 02:22 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 13-11-2012, 12:13 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by LR Trotter - 14-11-2012, 06:46 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 14-11-2012, 07:59 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 14-11-2012, 11:38 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 14-11-2012, 12:07 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 14-11-2012, 12:38 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 14-11-2012, 12:59 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 15-11-2012, 08:48 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 15-11-2012, 09:07 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 15-11-2012, 09:15 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 16-11-2012, 10:23 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 16-11-2012, 10:33 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 16-11-2012, 10:35 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 17-11-2012, 12:41 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 17-11-2012, 02:47 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 17-11-2012, 03:04 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 17-11-2012, 04:24 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 17-11-2012, 10:24 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 18-11-2012, 08:47 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 18-11-2012, 09:04 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 19-11-2012, 07:30 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 19-11-2012, 07:33 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 19-11-2012, 10:06 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 19-11-2012, 12:01 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 19-11-2012, 10:07 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 20-11-2012, 08:44 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 20-11-2012, 10:27 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 21-11-2012, 08:53 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-11-2012, 09:08 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-11-2012, 09:36 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 21-11-2012, 10:31 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 22-11-2012, 06:45 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 22-11-2012, 07:02 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 22-11-2012, 07:09 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 22-11-2012, 11:32 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 22-11-2012, 12:06 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 22-11-2012, 12:20 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 24-11-2012, 06:33 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 24-11-2012, 06:45 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 24-11-2012, 06:53 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 25-11-2012, 11:04 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by LR Trotter - 27-11-2012, 01:40 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 27-11-2012, 06:19 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 27-11-2012, 11:03 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by LR Trotter - 30-11-2012, 10:21 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 30-11-2012, 10:26 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by LR Trotter - 04-12-2012, 08:09 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 05-12-2012, 12:37 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 05-12-2012, 05:04 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by LR Trotter - 05-12-2012, 08:05 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 06-12-2012, 02:11 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 06-12-2012, 09:11 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 06-12-2012, 10:43 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by LR Trotter - 09-12-2012, 10:29 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 15-12-2012, 02:52 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 15-12-2012, 03:13 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 16-12-2012, 12:38 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 16-12-2012, 09:31 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 16-12-2012, 09:38 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 16-12-2012, 11:59 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 17-12-2012, 12:08 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 17-12-2012, 08:55 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 17-12-2012, 09:24 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 17-12-2012, 09:43 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 17-12-2012, 09:51 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 17-12-2012, 10:12 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 18-12-2012, 11:53 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 18-12-2012, 09:29 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 18-12-2012, 10:17 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 18-12-2012, 11:43 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 19-12-2012, 05:21 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 19-12-2012, 05:30 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 19-12-2012, 09:40 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 19-12-2012, 09:47 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 19-12-2012, 11:15 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 19-12-2012, 12:33 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 19-12-2012, 01:30 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 19-12-2012, 02:12 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 19-12-2012, 08:35 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 20-12-2012, 12:28 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 20-12-2012, 01:16 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 20-12-2012, 03:03 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 20-12-2012, 03:18 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 20-12-2012, 03:37 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 20-12-2012, 03:48 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 20-12-2012, 03:52 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 20-12-2012, 05:57 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 20-12-2012, 06:11 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 20-12-2012, 06:15 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 20-12-2012, 06:17 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 20-12-2012, 10:31 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 20-12-2012, 11:12 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 21-12-2012, 01:07 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-12-2012, 02:57 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-12-2012, 08:35 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-12-2012, 10:22 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-12-2012, 11:37 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-12-2012, 12:28 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-12-2012, 12:56 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-12-2012, 10:11 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-12-2012, 10:25 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-12-2012, 10:39 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-12-2012, 10:50 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-12-2012, 11:08 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-12-2012, 11:26 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-12-2012, 11:45 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 21-12-2012, 11:48 PM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 22-12-2012, 12:08 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 22-12-2012, 12:20 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 22-12-2012, 12:25 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 22-12-2012, 01:15 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 22-12-2012, 02:34 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 22-12-2012, 03:05 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 22-12-2012, 03:17 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 22-12-2012, 03:36 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 22-12-2012, 03:39 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Mark Stapleton - 22-12-2012, 03:58 AM
Michael Piper and Final Judgment - by Phil Dragoo - 22-12-2012, 08:34 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Final Proof Prayer Man Is Sarah Stanton Brian Doyle 3 581 13-06-2024, 07:04 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Michael LeFlem reviews Pieces of the Puzzle Jim DiEugenio 2 3,433 26-01-2019, 08:06 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  The Skorzeny Papers by Michael LeFlem Jim DiEugenio 4 5,911 22-10-2018, 03:21 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Final chain link Harry Dean 7 23,145 20-07-2018, 10:52 PM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Michael LaFLem on C. D. Jackson biography Jim DiEugenio 1 3,268 13-02-2018, 09:12 PM
Last Post: Alan Ford
  Michael Baden's Deceptions by Mili Cranor Jim DiEugenio 0 4,024 13-09-2017, 01:51 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Michael Best Archive R.K. Locke 1 2,993 22-08-2016, 11:44 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Michael Collins Piper Albert Doyle 49 14,757 03-10-2015, 06:30 PM
Last Post: Dawn Meredith
  Michael Baden isn't sure about Michael Brown's wounds Tracy Riddle 2 3,477 18-08-2014, 05:33 PM
Last Post: Tracy Riddle
  **OFFICIAL FINAL VERSION ** (NOT a satire!) Jim Hargrove 3 3,811 28-12-2013, 05:28 PM
Last Post: Marc Ellis

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)