9/11 Weekend - New hypothesis to Explain 9/11 - Part I

[Peter Lemkin]

Charles,

Let's not act so condescending and dismissive. I use the term MIHOP meaning intentionally placed devices with all three towers to destroy them.

Albert is correct that a LIHOP is tantamount to MIHOP because the outcome is more or less the same. The difference is that I contend that there is no hard evidence of CD and the towers seemed to have collapsed without CD devices... but from a sequence beginning with planes hitting them.

Could your sponsor friends and their mechanics/operative have known that hitting two towers would knock 3 towers down? I seriously doubt it. So... one might analyze as follows:

WTC 7 not a CD -> likely Twins not a CD either

WTC 7 is a CD -> twins likely CD also

Why would they CD 7 and not 1 & 2? Who would believe that? answer no one. Two plane slam into the towers and what do you know WTC 7 collapses...

Charles I may not be the sharpest knife in the drawer... but I wasn't born yesterday either.

In a sense understanding (my MIHOP) view wtc 7 is key. If it's not a CD then it looks like the entire destruction was not CD and was a result of the plane damage and this may or may not have been intended.. complete destruction of the complex. My guess is that it wasn't and it went out of control so to speak. But they got the same results ultimately and simply had to cover their asses a bit more with deeper lies.

You don't like this theory? Tough nuggies. It's a free country! :dancingman: lighten up dude!

Jeff, our very nation's polity and future [and the World are on the line...light polite conversation/banter will not do]. IMO, you are either totally delusional, uninformed, or working for the dark side on 911 if you think WTC was not a CD...it almost more than the others is unexplainable but by nanothermite and deliberate demolition...with even better 'reasons' than the twin towers for what is contained and its destruction would hide...or you are a fool and never learned anything of physics, chemistry nor logic while attending university. Sorry, mate...but YOU are the problem here - you have been politely removed from AE-911 Truth and less politely from many other forums...why? Your unique [believed by ONE person on the Planet] unzip theory holds no water and has more flaws than I care to go into...yet you endlessly push [peddle it] Who do you work for...or what agenda do you work for?! Physics, chemistry, science, engineering, logic nor architectural experience are on you side...yet you persist...I myself classify you as an Sunstein disinfo [cognitive dissonance] agent. You support the official version, but make it 'seem' you do not. I for one am not fooled. AW-911-Truth was not and many others are not. I personally do not think you belong on this Forum and are antithetical to it. It is not, however, my decision. I do not find your theory plausible by any science I know [and I have a doctorate in related sciences]....and while you are 'polite', I sense it is just your ploy to spread your 'doubt' of anything but the official version - though you couch it as if it were a version opposed to the official one...it is NOT.