9/11 Weekend - New hypothesis to Explain 9/11 - Part I

[Peter Lemkin]

Let'se see the calculations. Note that bldg 7 collapsed... much like a CD and all the concrete likewise turned to dust. Th collapse of WTC 7 looked very different Lemkin yet produced the same amount and quality of dust. Why?

Because the dust was from the concrete which was ground up and crushed and the floors broke apart. When you have no stone aggregate, light weight concrete of that mass crashing down it DOES grind itself up and produced dust.

When you show the calcs we'll run it by some other physicists.

No one agrees with you and the calculations have already been done and I've posted them. You are only here, IMO, to stall things to bring 'question and doubt /cognitive dissonance' into the mix. Physicists and others have done the math and the calculations and you are wrong - there is not the energy unless there is an exrta input from some 'energetic' and we'll have to make that explosives and/or cutting charges. You're just playing the child's game of always saying 'no' last to whatever is said. I don't even get the gut feeling you believe in what you write - your just an obstructionist to the horrible alternatives to the official Big Lies of 911. NOTHING about the official version, other than the day, is true.

And wrong on the floor materials 'just turning to dust'.....the actual materials have been evaluated and calculated and not only that but all the glass, desks, phones, computers, chairs, carpets, ceiling tiles and supports....everything that makes up a building was pulverized into a pyroclastic [small particles, hot] cloud - only seen volcanoes and extensive explosive damage....not in collapsing buildings. It never happened before or since and only in your and those who hide the truth of 911 - that puts you in pretty bad company, IMHO.