9/11 Weekend - New hypothesis to Explain 9/11 - Part I

[Peter Lemkin]

Is it possible all the pulverized material in the Tower accumulated into the pile and became a burn-able mass? This would be like a furnace insulated on top, fed with materials in the middle, and vented with oxygen from the pavilion tunnels underneath. The fires burning in the Towers would serve as the 'hot coal" for this furnace.

NO! [size=12]Do some homework. All tests have shown that there was almost NO combustible materials in the dust - what had been combustible had been consumed prior to / during the explosions and pyroclastic cloud formation. Second, there was little oxygen to feed any combustion and lots of water and special foams sprayed on by the fire department. The high temperatures and the continued temperatures for many months high enough to keep steel molten are nothing short of suspicious and the smoking gun. Your making up scenarios to fit a pre-determined outcome, rather than taking the evidence as it is and the science as it is. JO does much the same - all 911 Deniers do....they have to....the facts and evidence - even the laws of physics, chemistry and logic are not on their side.
[/SIZE]