9/11 Weekend - New hypothesis to Explain 9/11 - Part I

[Lauren Johnson]

Albert,

I think that is a good assessment. I find it hard to believe that they had what it takes to do a demo on such short notice AND to send a crew into such an unstable building believing it could fall at any moment.

I can't rule out a CD cause for the COLLAPSE, but there is no hard evidence of it. Something went wrong at the transfer truss #3 and that led to the building collapsing straight down. It was a progression of failures through the structure on floors 6&7. I think that you can take to the bank.

I see your thesis as highly speculative. You haven't managed to persuade many of your peers regarding it. You say there are only 1500 technical people out of 250k who could have signed on. How many have you got in the Jeffrey Orling 9/11 Skeptics movement? You and ... how many?

As I have written for months now since it took almost 8 hrs for the collapse to begin (and of course end in a few seconds) a gradual weakening MAY have been what was going on. To me it signals a heat cause... but the source of the heat is speculation. The explosions witnessed were not large enough to destroy the structure AND they were witnessed as early as 10 am and the building stood for 7 more hrs.

The loud sounds heard just before the VISIBLE movement could be the structure giving way inside. Can't really know for sure since we can't see inside the building where the undoing was being done.

Then we get to the loud sounds before the collapse. Of course they were prior to the collapse. That would certainly fit the pattern of CD. It might well fit your model. That is not the point.

They are loud and sequential as seen in the following video starting at 1:98 and on. I am focusing on the sequential nature of the booms -- loud enough to be heard on a directional mic -- that's loud.



In fact, the unique construction features which Orling writes about, which I do not deny, would make the building easier to take down by CD. A few charges, and down it comes.

Note the sequential charges on this building: