Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
911 Meta Analysis
#9
No... I am tired of Mr Drago insulting me and Mr Lemkin ignoring the facts I present and spamming the discussion with lengthy repostings.

I am all for civil discourse, but it seems impossible he on the topics which interest me and which I have a but of expertise that virtually none of the other members have. Intelligent poeple but difficult for me to have a discussion with most of them. Founding members who write responses like ... game set point in a discussion of a technical matter is simply impossible to respond to.

Mr Drago dismisses everything I have written because he considers that I have no comprehension of acceptance of his deep political analysis of the world. And Mr. Lemkin accuses me repeatedly of being a Sunstein agent or a peddler of disinfo and NIST shill. This is not an atmosphere for polite and intelligent interchange.

I am not interested in another echo chamber on 9-11 memes. I've read them all, seen all the their vids and heard many of their lectures.

The destruction of the WTC was a very technical matter and probably beyond my level of understand of structure and physics. I certainly am not going to be dressed down by those who are even more clueless than I with such arrogance and dismissiveness.

If you want to continue a discussion on the technical aspects of the destruction of the WTC you can contact me via email jsandero at geeee male dot calm.

ciao
Reply


Messages In This Thread
911 Meta Analysis - by Jeffrey Orling - 22-10-2012, 09:32 PM
911 Meta Analysis - by Peter Lemkin - 22-10-2012, 10:23 PM
911 Meta Analysis - by Jeffrey Orling - 22-10-2012, 10:28 PM
911 Meta Analysis - by Charles Drago - 22-10-2012, 10:30 PM
911 Meta Analysis - by Peter Lemkin - 22-10-2012, 10:34 PM
911 Meta Analysis - by Jeffrey Orling - 22-10-2012, 10:48 PM
911 Meta Analysis - by Charles Drago - 22-10-2012, 11:21 PM
911 Meta Analysis - by Albert Doyle - 23-10-2012, 12:30 AM
911 Meta Analysis - by Jeffrey Orling - 23-10-2012, 12:52 AM
911 Meta Analysis - by Charles Drago - 23-10-2012, 02:21 AM
911 Meta Analysis - by Phil Dragoo - 23-10-2012, 02:50 AM
911 Meta Analysis - by Albert Doyle - 23-10-2012, 04:09 AM
911 Meta Analysis - by Peter Lemkin - 23-10-2012, 07:01 AM
911 Meta Analysis - by Peter Lemkin - 23-10-2012, 07:24 AM
911 Meta Analysis - by Phil Dragoo - 23-10-2012, 08:52 AM
911 Meta Analysis - by Peter Lemkin - 23-10-2012, 11:01 AM
911 Meta Analysis - by Albert Doyle - 23-10-2012, 04:09 PM
911 Meta Analysis - by Peter Lemkin - 23-10-2012, 07:55 PM
911 Meta Analysis - by Albert Doyle - 23-10-2012, 08:54 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  New Detailed Analysis of WTC 7 Controlled Demolition Peter Lemkin 0 5,210 01-12-2015, 04:42 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  The case against the NIST WTC 7 collapse initiation analysis Tony Szamboti 4 3,992 04-11-2013, 07:11 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  New Analysis Summary Of 9-11-01 Insider Trading [with some very interesting facts, if true]! Peter Lemkin 4 5,494 28-10-2013, 03:01 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis Lauren Johnson 674 193,041 01-10-2013, 03:28 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Some Misunderstandings Related to WTC Collapse Analysis: Redux Lauren Johnson 0 3,701 16-08-2013, 03:39 AM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  New Seismic Analysis Further Points to Controlled Demolition.... Peter Lemkin 0 3,680 03-12-2012, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  911 Meta Analysis Diagram Jeffrey Orling 4 4,157 03-01-2011, 06:06 PM
Last Post: Jeffrey Orling
  Discussion: Vector And Turn Analysis Of Observed And Measured Flight Paths Of 9/11 WTC Aircraft Ed Jewett 1 3,401 28-03-2010, 09:23 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)