23-10-2012, 02:50 AM
Peter
A quick pull quote from your substantial post states my point of view which is contrary to any agnostism insisting lack of evidence:
911: It either knowingly happened at the level of the White House, or the highest levels of the government were wilfully blind.
FBI Counter-Terrorism chief John O'Neill warned of such an attack. His briefcase containing classified files was stolen when he was called to the phone at an FBI seminar. O'Neill was sidelined, and as the final insult, died in the towers' collapse working there as a security chief.
Special Agent Colleen Rowley wrote a very long letter to FBI Director Robert Mueller complaining she was ignored when she reported Middle Eastern men taking lessons in U.S. flight schools to learn how to fly airliners, not land or take off.
Dangerous men on no-fly lists flew.
Yet how soon was the story assembled and distributed, much as in Dallas.
Nineteen men and their leader is in Afghanistan.
Why, it's a casus belli after all.
Now, was it left to the White House, or was it engineered at a level higher.
That is, if it wasn't Johnson, or Hoover, or Dulles, or any of the false sponsors (Oil men, Cuban exiles, KGB, Mossad, et cetera) then was it a sponsor acting through facilitators who would activate mechanics while anesthetizing the normal defenses in the manner of an Angleton operation described in Newman.
I found A Certain Arrogance by George Michael Evica (TrineDay Edition with Introduction by Charles Robert Drago); Thy Will Be Done : The Conquest of the Amazon: Nelson Rockefeller and Evangelism in the Age of Oil, by Gerard Colby and Charlotte Dennett; as well as Conjuring Hitler by Guido Giacomo Preparata to illustrate the discreet and deniable application of power.
The towers present as large keys to relinquishing civil liberties (hello Reichstag), casus belli (Goodbye, Maine), and battle cry in patriotic war (Remember the Alamo).
A quick pull quote from your substantial post states my point of view which is contrary to any agnostism insisting lack of evidence:
911: It either knowingly happened at the level of the White House, or the highest levels of the government were wilfully blind.
FBI Counter-Terrorism chief John O'Neill warned of such an attack. His briefcase containing classified files was stolen when he was called to the phone at an FBI seminar. O'Neill was sidelined, and as the final insult, died in the towers' collapse working there as a security chief.
Special Agent Colleen Rowley wrote a very long letter to FBI Director Robert Mueller complaining she was ignored when she reported Middle Eastern men taking lessons in U.S. flight schools to learn how to fly airliners, not land or take off.
Dangerous men on no-fly lists flew.
Yet how soon was the story assembled and distributed, much as in Dallas.
Nineteen men and their leader is in Afghanistan.
Why, it's a casus belli after all.
Now, was it left to the White House, or was it engineered at a level higher.
That is, if it wasn't Johnson, or Hoover, or Dulles, or any of the false sponsors (Oil men, Cuban exiles, KGB, Mossad, et cetera) then was it a sponsor acting through facilitators who would activate mechanics while anesthetizing the normal defenses in the manner of an Angleton operation described in Newman.
I found A Certain Arrogance by George Michael Evica (TrineDay Edition with Introduction by Charles Robert Drago); Thy Will Be Done : The Conquest of the Amazon: Nelson Rockefeller and Evangelism in the Age of Oil, by Gerard Colby and Charlotte Dennett; as well as Conjuring Hitler by Guido Giacomo Preparata to illustrate the discreet and deniable application of power.
The towers present as large keys to relinquishing civil liberties (hello Reichstag), casus belli (Goodbye, Maine), and battle cry in patriotic war (Remember the Alamo).