23-10-2012, 04:09 PM
Quote:But as videos of the towers show,[19] there were no signs of bending or sagging, even on the floors just above the damage caused by the impact of the planes. The buildings were perfectly motionless up to the moment they began their collapse.
Wrong Peter. I saw a video that showed a clearly visible sagging floor truss in the fire section. Also there were obviously some kind of fires making the huge amount of smoke seen billowing away in the NW winds that were stoking the fires.
Another thing is the south Tower canted to one side before dropping showing the failure occured on that side. Also, both Towers fell from their top sections and not from any visible demolition charges beneath.
I'm just saying this for the sake of objectivity and nothing else.
Could anyone do me a favor and directly answer why, if there were few fires in the south Tower, would the plotters decide to blow it first and therefore create the question of why it fell without any hot fires if it was hit second? I haven't seen any direct answer to this.