24-10-2012, 08:36 PM
Terrifying Techno-Fascist Quote of the Day
24th October 2012
By Thomas L. McDonald
Patheos, October 2, 2012
"It is not my belief that an unmanned system will be able to be perfectly ethical in the battlefield, but I am convinced that they can perform more ethically than human soldiers are capable of." Ronald Arkin, Georgia Institute of Technology
201172711237920580 20 Terrifying Techno Fascist Quote of the DayWhat's the man talking about? Autonomous drones: dumb metal programmed by fallible humans to wage a more merciful war. (There's no such thing. Even Star Trek figured that out.)
There is a fundamentally anti-human belief that we can program an ethical machine that will coldly evaluate a situation and always make the right choice, unlike these icky meat sacks and their faulty programming. Humans, in this evaluation, are just bad code. Remove them from the loop, and all will be well.
Professor, let me introduce you to Lieutenant Colonel Stanislav Yevgrafovich Petrov, courtesy of Leah Libresco, who declined to annihilate the planet despite overwhelming (and false) evidence that this would have been the proper course of action. The computer would have launched. The humantempered by human judgment and mercydid not.
Obama's drone war is already one of the most horrific, merciless, cold, inhuman war crimes of our time. Automation wouldn't make it any better. Giving drones the power and authority to kill-removing the human from the decision loop (something an officer once told me would never, ever happen)-is madness to the nth degree.
Professor Arkin is an expert on the subject of autonomous lethality in robots. I would suggest that this is nothing for which we need experts. We need to say: "Okay, no. We don't program robots with that capability, whatever short-sighted and spurious reasons you care to cook up to the contrary." We would be better without any robots at all than with even one programmed with the capacity to kill. Robots aren't actually necessary, and humanity can do just fine without them. You don't need to fear a world without robots. You need to fear a world with people who feel robots can be more "ethical" than humans. You need to fear a world where morality has collapsed so completely that an elite feels the need to restore that morality through machines. A machine is incapable of being a moral agent.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godandthema...f-the-day/
24th October 2012
By Thomas L. McDonald
Patheos, October 2, 2012
"It is not my belief that an unmanned system will be able to be perfectly ethical in the battlefield, but I am convinced that they can perform more ethically than human soldiers are capable of." Ronald Arkin, Georgia Institute of Technology
201172711237920580 20 Terrifying Techno Fascist Quote of the DayWhat's the man talking about? Autonomous drones: dumb metal programmed by fallible humans to wage a more merciful war. (There's no such thing. Even Star Trek figured that out.)
There is a fundamentally anti-human belief that we can program an ethical machine that will coldly evaluate a situation and always make the right choice, unlike these icky meat sacks and their faulty programming. Humans, in this evaluation, are just bad code. Remove them from the loop, and all will be well.
Professor, let me introduce you to Lieutenant Colonel Stanislav Yevgrafovich Petrov, courtesy of Leah Libresco, who declined to annihilate the planet despite overwhelming (and false) evidence that this would have been the proper course of action. The computer would have launched. The humantempered by human judgment and mercydid not.
Obama's drone war is already one of the most horrific, merciless, cold, inhuman war crimes of our time. Automation wouldn't make it any better. Giving drones the power and authority to kill-removing the human from the decision loop (something an officer once told me would never, ever happen)-is madness to the nth degree.
Professor Arkin is an expert on the subject of autonomous lethality in robots. I would suggest that this is nothing for which we need experts. We need to say: "Okay, no. We don't program robots with that capability, whatever short-sighted and spurious reasons you care to cook up to the contrary." We would be better without any robots at all than with even one programmed with the capacity to kill. Robots aren't actually necessary, and humanity can do just fine without them. You don't need to fear a world without robots. You need to fear a world with people who feel robots can be more "ethical" than humans. You need to fear a world where morality has collapsed so completely that an elite feels the need to restore that morality through machines. A machine is incapable of being a moral agent.
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/godandthema...f-the-day/
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass