26-10-2012, 06:22 PM
Albert... maybe it's time to up the dosage on your meds?

Again Albert... you're all rhetoric and no substance...
Saying, "the evidence is out there, really, go find it" is one helluva lame way to support your argument.
Your inability to follow my posts (ie BG's breakdown - I NEVER asked for proof of the breakdown, but PROOF that JFK and BG's lying about it to the USA, or rather JFK's HA(E)RSH insistence on an ally's cooperation
would send him over the edge... let's see, are the sources for his breakdown other ISRAELI'S :lol: )
and then your deleting YOUR comment in your reply, that I addressed, is amateurish at best.
YOU WROTE: Did you not?
Just to make it clear I think Piper is wrong in his suggestion Ben-Gurion was the initiating sponsor of the assassination.
Yet when you QUOTE/REPLY you conveniently erase it and only quote my response to it:...
Originally Posted by David Josephs![[Image: viewpost-right.png]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/images/buttons/viewpost-right.png)
Isn't this EXACTLY what I've been saying all along and explain above? or am I missing something? Piper IS WRONG Albert... yes... Israel was getting a bomb whether JFK liked it or not... and he STILL sold them Hawks.
Nice try David, but no. You're dishonest because this has already been explained to you
Yes indeed Albert... you yourself explained it in your posted sentence above.... and then avoided the issue by deleting it in your response... "kettle calling pot black?"
and also yes indeed Albert... anyone reading this thread can easily decide for themselves who is intellectually dishonest
and who quotes chapter and verse with a request for an explanation only to be met with insults, a rant and rave, and more hollow rhetorical BS.
DJ

Again Albert... you're all rhetoric and no substance...
Saying, "the evidence is out there, really, go find it" is one helluva lame way to support your argument.
Your inability to follow my posts (ie BG's breakdown - I NEVER asked for proof of the breakdown, but PROOF that JFK and BG's lying about it to the USA, or rather JFK's HA(E)RSH insistence on an ally's cooperation
would send him over the edge... let's see, are the sources for his breakdown other ISRAELI'S :lol: )
and then your deleting YOUR comment in your reply, that I addressed, is amateurish at best.
YOU WROTE: Did you not?
Just to make it clear I think Piper is wrong in his suggestion Ben-Gurion was the initiating sponsor of the assassination.
Yet when you QUOTE/REPLY you conveniently erase it and only quote my response to it:...
![[Image: viewpost-right.png]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/images/buttons/viewpost-right.png)
Isn't this EXACTLY what I've been saying all along and explain above? or am I missing something? Piper IS WRONG Albert... yes... Israel was getting a bomb whether JFK liked it or not... and he STILL sold them Hawks.
Nice try David, but no. You're dishonest because this has already been explained to you
Yes indeed Albert... you yourself explained it in your posted sentence above.... and then avoided the issue by deleting it in your response... "kettle calling pot black?"
and also yes indeed Albert... anyone reading this thread can easily decide for themselves who is intellectually dishonest
and who quotes chapter and verse with a request for an explanation only to be met with insults, a rant and rave, and more hollow rhetorical BS.
DJ

