27-10-2012, 12:25 AM
Go to the lengthy post #165 and note the uniquely different font size for the following paragraph ostensibly written by "Albert Doyle":
"David, once again, tries to draw the debate out into irrelevant, ruminating discussion of non-related assassination material. Pure evidence of his attempt to filibuster around the operative evidence. David, once again, doing a ballsy reversal of who is assuming the Lone Nut position here and denying the conspiracy evidence."
Could it be that "Albert," in his rush to copy and paste his ghostwriter's product onto the post, neglected to reconcile the difference?
"David, once again, tries to draw the debate out into irrelevant, ruminating discussion of non-related assassination material. Pure evidence of his attempt to filibuster around the operative evidence. David, once again, doing a ballsy reversal of who is assuming the Lone Nut position here and denying the conspiracy evidence."
Could it be that "Albert," in his rush to copy and paste his ghostwriter's product onto the post, neglected to reconcile the difference?