Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[Mark Stapleton]

Complicity in the coverup doesn't equate to knowing participation in JFK's murder, Charles.

You couldn't seriously accuse someone like Posner of participating in his murder.

The murderers are the main game here. The elusive sponsors who are never named in your model.

Acquaint yourself with the term "accessory after the fact," then get back to me. Take all the time you need.

I can, and I do. See above.

Your definition of "murderers" is vague and wholly uninformed. Your interpretation of the Evica-Drago model is devoid of understanding and insight.

Charles, in post #254 you stated, "..complicity in the coverup--and thus, by definition, participation in the conspiracy to murder JFK.."

I just don't agree with your definition in this context. Many individuals have been complicit in the coverup over the last 49 years. Not all of them participated in the conspiracy to murder JFK in 1963. Your definition is too broad and over-reaching. When referring to someone like Ruby however, I think your definition holds true.

"Murderers" means those who authorised, planned and carried out the hit in Dealey Plaza. I'm mainly concerned with the sponsors, or those individuals who first came up with the idea and then made it happen. Isn't that the Holy Grail?