Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[Mark Stapleton]

Charles, in post #254 you stated, "..complicity in the coverup--and thus, by definition, participation in the conspiracy to murder JFK.."

Mark, be careful. I have to agree with Charles here. Complicity, by whichever form, in the cover-up is tantamount to being the present day active conspirators. This is shown in the effectiveness of the present day media in covering-up the evidence. So much so as to be indistinguishable from the actual conspirators.

While I believe Piper has shown valid evidence that Israel had serious participation in JFK's assassination I have to defer to the Deep Political model as being the foremost qualifier of any and all assassination evidence. Charles is correct in this case so I don't want any association to your questioning of it. However, to be fair, I feel Charles is using strict, draconian application of the Deep Political model to phase out real and credible evidence of Israel's involvement as presented by Piper.

Yes, what I was trying to say to Charles is that the people at the top of the pyramid should ultimately be the main focus, not the plethora of individuals who, over the last half century, have been complicit in the coverup. We already know the names of many of these anyway.

And to Charles I say, with respect, that you seem to use the model as a blunt instrument to bludgeon the highly plausible idea that a Zionist cabal was involved in the assassination at a very high level.