Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[Greg Burnham]

Thanks for providing that information, Phil and Charles. I think that if I was accused of being other than who I am, I would at least respond in some way.

Albert, inquiring minds want to know....

Don,

As you know part of my job at JFKresearch Assassination Forum was the smoking out of agents provocateur. In better than 90% of the cases where I sounded the alarm, it was eventually
proved through technical tracking by Rich (and back channels), that I had successfully identified perpetrators from their "signature" inconsistencies. It wasn't 100%, but there was still
"issues" even with those who were "innocent of false identity" trouble makers. As I already said, I have no stature here beyond researcher and certainly didn't mean to come across as a
DPF cop. But, imagine if you will, if Gary Severson suddenly had displayed a similar writing style, including idiom, syntax, and rhetoric to that of David Lifton -- all beginning in a single
thread? Further imagine that his posts grew in length from their normally abbreviated length of "one liners" to perhaps 10 or 20 times as long. What if he lost his usual irritability and became
soothingly rational in tone, but not necessarily in content? What if his sentences, which were regularly disjointed and poorly constructed, became suddenly fluid and well articulated albeit
lacking in foundation? And finally, what if his normal grammatical and/or spelling errors all but disappeared? Such things as dangling modifiers and specifically dangling participles were
once rife throughout "Albert's" sentences, but no more. For these reasons I believe that there is a very high probability that there is something about "Albert" ...
Just as a concerned citizen. :noblesteed: