Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[Albert Doyle]

I haven't really noticed the literary inconsistencies Charles points to. I've read quite a lot of Albert's posts now. I don't know why Albert doesn't respond to such an allegation. He must have his reasons.

I've called for sticking to the on-topic subject matter. I feel some are flagrantly trying to divert the topic to avoid discussing the material. If anyone is like Fetzer, in my opinion, it is those imagining entities when they can't answer basic points. Mark, you should be smart enough to see that any answer you give to that will be used against you (as it is intended) and will also be used to divert from the on-topic subject matter. Shouting "Witch!" louder and louder when shown material in Piper you can't answer is no credible form of debate.


I think those who doubt Piper have forfeited this debate.