10-11-2012, 03:21 AM
The basis of Chomsky's failure vis a vis his JFK analysis is not difficult to discern.
Chomsky does not allow for what I would term JFK's spiritual evolution -- the phenomenon that James Douglass discerns and dissects, and for which he provides, eloquently, irrefutable evidence.
But please bear in mind: Those who claim that JFK was, spiritually, fully formed at an early age make the same fatal error in judgment that Chomsky makes.
Chomsky does not allow for what I would term JFK's spiritual evolution -- the phenomenon that James Douglass discerns and dissects, and for which he provides, eloquently, irrefutable evidence.
But please bear in mind: Those who claim that JFK was, spiritually, fully formed at an early age make the same fatal error in judgment that Chomsky makes.
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum
If an individual, through either his own volition or events over which he had no control, found himself taking up residence in a country undefined by flags or physical borders, he could be assured of one immediate and abiding consequence: He was on his own, and solitude and loneliness would probably be his companions unto the grave.
-- James Lee Burke, Rain Gods
You can't blame the innocent, they are always guiltless. All you can do is control them or eliminate them. Innocence is a kind of insanity.
-- Graham Greene