Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[Albert Doyle]

Thank you Albert and Mark for making your case....

I'm confident anyone reading thru the thread will get a fair dose of both sides of the debate...

Cheers
DJ

And so David blinks. Forced to by the facts.


I think we've seen the way that some claim this Piper issue "has already been discussed." Obviously it hasn't in any credible way. No, the offense here isn't bigotry or anti-semitism, it's a rogue double standard and pure bias in favor of Israel.


The most noticeable absence here is that of James DiEugenio. DiEugenio has a rare talent for detail and usually doesn't miss a stitch on this kind of matter. He said that Final Judgment was disinformation and that he tossed the book into the trash can where it belonged. However, having read DiEugenio I find that his particular method is to uproot and destroy any false work by means of its furthest-most sources and material. What is really noticeable here is he doesn't do that with Piper. In fact, if you read this thread, no one does it. This, along with the eye-blinks, as well as the trolling, should be evidence enough of Piper's validity - albeit a partial one due to his incorrect claim that Israel was perhaps the Sponsor.


I notice that David's prolific typos went unmocked...