Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[Charles Drago]

I admire and respect Charles as the author of the Evica/Drago model that has taught me a lot. And post here in respect to it. But in the sense of fair debate I offer that this sort of evidences what is the 'twin' material. I am not trying to provoke (though I'm not sure that can be said for others). I think objective people can see what the facts are driving here. The topic is Piper and his book Final Judgment. Are we praising Albert or condemning him according to the points that are obviously being avoided?

If the person who wrote the post above is indeed the historic "Albert Doyle" -- the individual who first came to DPF some time ago -- I address you thusly:

Come clean, Albert. Identify the person or persons who have been posting here over your name and with your permission. Explain your motives for allowing this deception to occur. If you do, you will regain the respect and legitimacy that, thanks to your perfidy, you now have lost. I shall personally champion your return to the fold of honorable JFK researchers and activists.

But if you choose to continue the now thoroughly exposed "Albert Doyle" charade, the JFK community will treat you as the pariah you surely have become.

The choice is yours.

Or "yours."

That's silly Charles. What is obvious here is a desperate attempt to avoid the subject matter of Piper. I think Mark and myself have won that issue as David's obvious concession shows.

I think what your post here shows is your realization, as I pointed-out, that if you really thought there was some kind of Colby entity posting under my name you wouldn't have given me the positive feedback you did in the post outlined. I think you realized that after I pointed it out and are now trying to compensate for it. Which is kind of silly and ridiculous. Especially when it is obvious it is being used for the sole purpose of avoiding Piper. As you yourself acknowledge here, albeit in a face-saving inverse way, there's no way the 'real' Albert you credit would have sat back and allowed any Colby types to post under his name. Hence you yourself disprove your absurd charges with your own words.

I think this has obviously been forced by the credibility of Piper's material (which has gone totally undiscussed by some). It's amazing what some otherwise highly credible people will do to avoid Piper's evidence. Colby's a Lone Nutter. It's obviously ridiculous to compare me to him. What I think is most obvious here is no person like David has ever backed-down from a Colby, Cinque, Fetzer, Rago-type. That right there proves what's what here. If we were honest the issue here isn't over imaginary witch's, it is over Piper and a deeply-resented topic. This is a simple matter of honesty.

"You" are finished in the JFK community, "Albert Doyle."

"You" had "your" chance to confess to "your" involvement in this painfully obvious deception.

Instead, "you" have chosen to allow this charade to continue.

The identity of the person or persons posting over the "Albert Doyle" signature remain(s) a matter of informed conjecture. This collective entity's mannered writing style and impaired polemics reek of Jim Fetzer -- especially the desperate "if you don't agree with me, you haven't read the material" and the "if you challenge my legitimacy or sanity, it's because you cannot refute my argument" fallback positions.

But in the final analysis, this truth is now inescapable: "Albert Doyle" has joined the ranks of "Len Colby" as an outed agent provocateur. And I shall make it my personal business to expose "Albert Doyle's" perfidy to the larger JFK research community.

"You" are finished, "Albert Doyle."