13-11-2012, 05:20 PM
This is crazy. As I posted in my last entry this thread hijack is obviously being driven by the overt restriction of any objective discussion of Piper. There are obviously some people who believe their viewpoint on Piper is gospel and cannot be discussed or analyzed. Once the evidence becomes clearly in favor of Piper these people will resort to extreme measures to avoid admitting that. Fetzer is a person who, in order to prove his theories, will resort to imaginary things to make-up for his failures. I daresay it is not I who is doing that here since I know for a fact I have been the only person posting. So to see embarrassing attempts to describe evidence of different posters being detected only heightens this absurdity and the cause for it. Like I said, if Charles really thought there were numerous people posting under my name he wouldn't have recognized the 'real' Albert like he did. For if there was a real Albert then that would mean he was somehow allowing other people to post under his name without protesting. And if that were the case then there wouldn't be any 'real' Albert would there? Instead of answering this Charles says I'm finished here. Hmm. I think Charles' entry that he can't figure out why the real Albert would allow this is the ridiculous entry that it is and internally disproves itself. The answer is the real Albert wouldn't allow that so Charles' statement is self-disproving. Realizing that he then furthers the ridiculousness by accusing me of being an agent provocateur. All because I (Mark, really) forced David off his bogus arguments. And Don correctly notices that while I am having another ridiculous Salem witch-hunt accusation of being Fetzer himself aimed at me the accusers forget I am one of the most outspoken critics of Fetzer. Again, we see who the real Fetzers are here. But all this business is just taking the bait and enabling the thread hijack. There's obviously an arbitrary subject restriction here involving Israel, and that's exactly why I'm interested in it. It's amazing what some people will do to avoid objective discussion of Piper. Funny, I never had any accusations of being Rago-like until I discussed Israel. And this from people who haven't uttered single word over Piper's actual evidence. Seems we now have witch subjects and non-witch subjects. No, this is deliberate gratuitous aggression designed to provoke a response that is then used to justify a premeditated polarization. This is evidenced by the fact that not only are the accusations false but their makers haven't participated in the debate.
The on-topic subject matter shows that David was so wrong that he was forced to abandon the debate. What David jumped ship over was the fact the evidence he had exactly backwards, and blew up in his face, showed that Kennedy enforced his nuclear restriction by drastically cutting Israel's military budget only one month before his assassination. This is right in line with Kennedy's efforts as detailed in 'The Unspeakable'. I dare ask if this would be more likely to make Echevarria's statement more connected or less connected to the motivations behind the assassination?
The on-topic subject matter shows that David was so wrong that he was forced to abandon the debate. What David jumped ship over was the fact the evidence he had exactly backwards, and blew up in his face, showed that Kennedy enforced his nuclear restriction by drastically cutting Israel's military budget only one month before his assassination. This is right in line with Kennedy's efforts as detailed in 'The Unspeakable'. I dare ask if this would be more likely to make Echevarria's statement more connected or less connected to the motivations behind the assassination?