Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[Greg Burnham]

Mark,


There's no possible way Altgens shows Oswald in the doorway.

First off "Albert(s) Doyle", there is no possible way that you or anyone can be THAT certain of the statement you just made. The Altgens is inconclusive at best.

I have to say Fetzer damages both himself and the community with his ridiculous defense of this. You should be very careful because such defense of Rago and Fetzer will only threaten your credibility towards Piper.

Second, Fetzer did not damage himself or anyone else by having investigated the possibility that there exists credible evidence of LHO being in the doorway. The damage ocurred when he committed multiple fallacies in support of a single-minded pursuit, especially "Special Pleading" among others. I think this post by "the Albert(s) Doyle" is a weak attempt at further subterfuge in which "they" disguise themselves as rational and "come across" as if "they" are the organic Albert Doyle.

The issue isn't that Fetzer defended the concept of the possibility that LHO was in the doorway. The issue is that in a nearly feeble minded methodology he abused logic and language in order to promote a single minded pursuiit, namely: exonnerating LHO and proving his innocence. If indeed Oswald is innocent (and I personally do believe that is the case) then allow the evidence to lead where it may. One need not arbitrarily claim that photographic alteration was performed when that photographic evidence is in reality neutral with respect to the hypothesis being advanced. The Altgens can neither conclusively rule in or rule out the possibility of Oswald on the steps. Fetzer claims it is tainted evidence by virtue of his belief that it has been altered to obscure the LHO presence...when, in reality, the images in Altgens are simply organically obscure. "Albert Doyle" wants to claim that the organically obscure Altgens is clear enough to prove LHO was NOT in the doorway.

Both are committing fallacies.