Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[Charles Drago]

Try minding your own business. My "style" is my business. Your observations relevant to it are neither insightful nor helpful to me or anyone else whose reading comprehension skills are above the third grade level.

Why do you and your short bus comrades insist upon arguing that the ignorance in which you dwell so blissfully is universally shared?

Offensive enough for you? If not, I can ratchet it up a few notches.

For the second time -- at least -- the DPF is NOT "Charles' forum." I am one of four owners. I do NOT have "the right to run it the way want." I'm not sure how I can state these facts more clearly so as to penetrate your bliss. Perhaps a different post for each word would do the trick.

Finally (would that it were so), you might want to spend a few weeks studying the definitions of "imply" and "infer."

Sorry if I'm being overly critical ...

Charles, you are clearly incapable of even conceding that you might perhaps be wrong about anything. "Short bus comrades?" I was hoping your earlier juvenile slur was just a flippant, emotional defense mechanism. It appears you have no problem with using terms that are offensive to anyone who has ever had a loved one whom others would call "retard."

I don't really care what Albert Doyle thinks about any aspect of this case- he has been accused unfairly of being an imposter, and I will always speak up for someone in that situation. And Jim Fetzer's name is being unfairly dragged through the mud here, by inferences that he is posting under Doyle's name. I don't know why he doesn't defend himself, but he seems not be frequenting any forums nowadays, and I had to say that I think it's outrageous to make these kinds of wild accusations.

I apologize for thinking this was your forum. Regardless, anyone who reads these threads knows that Charles is in Charge here.

Yawn.

Beep.