Michael Piper and Final Judgment

[David Josephs]

So Albert,
Do you believe Lansky was in the same league as NE/CFR establishment?
Sat at the same tables and broke bread...

David,

Sorry, have to bow out. Other pressing research issues have arisen.


Let me just say you are trying to mix credible eastern establishment Sponsor apples with facilitator oranges there.


Really, you have to crack open Piper and quote to do this right and I don't have time. However I think I've done a good job of showing that even the general information can chase opponents like it did with you and others. Lansky fit a key funding source and political orientation facilitator position that served the interests of the Sponsors. Your questions are damnable because it's obvious they are trying to get around this.


However, where we left off, and you never answered, is that the correct Israeli military funding dropped significantly in the 1964 funding year. Since this was decided under JFK in October 1963 that means it occurred one month before the assassination. Realize what your side is contending is that Angleton, even though Newman shows his Counter Intelligence office to be a controlling entity in the assassination, did not somehow influence Israel regarding this matter even though he was CIA liaison to Israel. Everything fits like a glove yet you return with "Quien es mas macho?" questions over irrelevant sponsors.

Yes indeed Albert... tail between legs and off you go when asked to actually OPEN and QUOTE from the book you seem to have under your pillow at night.

You jumped into this thread, guns blazing about Piper and his proof... and have come up short with each and every request to PROVE YOUR POINT....

You, like Specter and Bugliosi have decided the conclusions without regard for the ACTUAL evidence... only the evidence as it appears in your mind as it supports the conclusion...
The amount of "competing and contradictory evidence" is just as persuasive
... wheels on the bus go round and round....

If i understand your post.. you separate Meyer from CFR clan as we do Facilitator/Sponsor...

Lansky fit a key funding source and political orientation facilitator position that served the interests of the Sponsors

In our model... do facilitators get to make the rules? call the shots? initiate the activities?
Or would that be the SPONSOR MASTERS....

Neither Mossad/Lansky/CIA/BG were SPONSORS of the assassination... If the CFR clan directs the "machine" into an activity.... and Mossad is PART of that activity...
the next logical conclusion is NOT that Israel was behind the killing... unless the CFR clan desired it as a red herring to once again keep the focus on them...

Worked very well too as we have an entire book, and a few ardent followers, trying to claim that these WERE the sponsors and for reasons that stretch credibility beyond its breaking point.

Good luck on your other research... but THAT GLOVE DONT FIT SO YOU MUST ACQUIT... :-)