23-11-2012, 11:52 PM
Jan Klimkowski Wrote:David Josephs Wrote:the future CFR generation's ongoing control and influence of said systemprecludes any one crack from bringing down the system. Democracy is only slow to change for thoseoutside this system… for those within and pulling strings it's simply a matterof which way the wind blows and adjusting sails.
That you do not "know" the CFR and roots before it,extending to the Banking Control of the Rothschilds are the Sponsors ofALL is a matter of semantics?. I'm sincerely surprised at thatcomment of yours CD… maybe you only "suspect"without specific knowledge…. Maybe they simply take advantage of global events AFTER they occur and are not primemovers in when/how/why they occur… toome that is KNOWing that only those that qualify as SPONSOR can behave as such.
Complete and utter hogwash.
Ffs - what is happening to this forum?
Maybe I was not clear... tongue in cheek... "Maybe they simply...." that was my point.
If one is to be "sponsor" then by definition the events are "created" to specifically take advantage of them...
Are you contesting whether democracy is not designed to slow change... while at the same time the bureacracy that it spawns is designed to create illusions of change
all the while stiffling.... unless you WANT something done... you are on the LIST... and it gets done...
You have 50 miles thick of barbed wire and you want to start cutting thru it... not seeing the tangled mess trailing behind?
CD Wrote:[What I suspect is that the powers that Sponsored world-historic crimes the likes of JFK's murder are not easily reduced to initials, and that, like the Bilderbergs and Rothschilds, the CFR may just as likely be a False Sponsor as a Sponsor.
Nor do I agree that the system cannot be changed from within, even at the nano level.
While not easily reduced CD, they do rear their ugly head and leave a wake... when one says CFR one understands the 100 families occupying those seats.
If indeed THESE are another layer of the onion... I welcome a description of who could possibly pull those strings...
There MUST be ideological differences in these families, so one GRAND PLAN may differ from another....
but if we agree that it all starts with the money supply and THEN the political system it supports... which in turn creates the conditions for the "masses"
Whose interests are bigger than the money's?
Whose worldside networks get stronger and stronger while countries and governments come and go?
Who stands to GAIN more from the TRILLIONS being haggled over - regardless of which way it falls?
CD?