30-11-2012, 02:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 30-11-2012, 04:09 PM by Charles Drago.)
Greg Burnham Wrote:Phil Dragoo Wrote:Larry and Greg
Digital imagery was used by Dartmouth FBI stooge Hany Farid to claim the Backyard Photos were not fraudulent.
Among the tool's appalling omissions were the many anomalies unrelated to the nose--say, the chin, to name one, huge, incongruity.
The pursuit of any unexplained identity in Altgens' doorway ought to be considered well apart from its bearing on Oswald's innocence.
It alone cannot presume to cover the matter; it is merely a possible time-stamped alibi, but one not lethal in its abscence.
Lee Oswald got change from a woman of Robert Groden's acquaintance, an act placing him outside the sniper's nest when the Warren Commission said he was there.
The Girl on the Stairs didn't see him there when the Warren Commission said he must have been.
Truly and Baker provide another time-stamp exonerating Oswald; how quaint the Coke was censored. How tiresome the "experts" claim Oswald could've "easily" run the steeplechase, stashed the piece, descended the stairs, et cetera to arrive breathing calmly for the sudden arrivals.
DeRosa World notes the censored Coke:
http://derosaworld.typepad.com/derosawor...-coke.html
The above account is droll.
We might ask Oswald.
He'd say, he was in the lunchroom drinking a Coke.
I agree 100% Phil. The evidence placing him on the steps is not strong enough to be exculpatory, but all the rest of the evidence placing him off the 6th floor is.
And therein is found the great danger to our work inherent in the "Cinque"/Fetzer garbage:
Implicitly bestow upon the "LHO in Altgens 6" conclusion the status of "make or break" conspiracy argument, and prepare to be broken.
And in the process, accept the likelihood of another fifty years of doubt and futility.
Ask a simple question: If Altgens 6 did not exist, would proof of conspiracy be the slightest bit weakened?