Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
DPF Bans Professor James H. Fetzer: The Rationale
#10
Fetzer is now describing himself thusly:

"I am among the only professional scholars to be involved in JFK research [.]"

As I am among the only North American males to be involved in JFK research.

These statements are meaningless as either quantifications or qualifications.

Fetzer is setting up an invalid argument from authority.

Such intellectual dishonesty is among the Fetzer trademark qualities that I voted to ban from DPF.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
DPF Bans Professor James H. Fetzer: The Rationale - by Charles Drago - 10-12-2012, 10:39 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The Dirty Research Community Under James Gordon Brian Doyle 1 256 21-02-2025, 05:59 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  James Gordon - Here Is Your Opportunity Brian Doyle 3 855 08-06-2024, 04:04 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  My Education Forum Re-admission Request To James Gordon Brian Doyle 4 1,498 14-08-2023, 03:14 PM
Last Post: Brian Doyle
  Professor Pulte Milo Reech 5 6,659 14-03-2020, 11:34 PM
Last Post: Milo Reech
  The James Wilcott affidavit and deposition Jim DiEugenio 0 2,245 12-11-2019, 06:05 AM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  James DiEugenio, I have a single question, would you answer? Scott Kaiser 12 8,657 11-06-2019, 04:32 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Is James McCord dead? Jim DiEugenio 22 15,043 18-05-2019, 01:37 AM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  James powell redux Richard Gilbride 0 2,621 26-01-2019, 12:06 AM
Last Post: Richard Gilbride
  James Curtis Jenkins at the Lancer conference Daniel Gallup 2 5,290 27-10-2018, 09:15 PM
Last Post: Lauren Johnson
  Lisa Pease on James Angleton Jim DiEugenio 7 10,185 07-03-2018, 03:22 AM
Last Post: Nathaniel Heidenheimer

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)