13-12-2012, 06:47 PM
The "Albert Doyle" provocation continues -- boldly, arrogantly, defiantly.
The following quotes, ostensibly from the cyber pen of the historic "Albert Doyle" whose DPF posts for years were characterized by their brevity, absence of confrontational language, and utterly atrocious writing, give away the provocateurs' game.
Either more than one person is posting over the "Doyle" signature, or the historic "Doyle" was playing an equally nefarious game be posing as a semi-literate dolt in order to set up the current game.
I've added emphasis in BOLD to draw your attention to vocabulary and constructions far beyond any writing ever presented by the historic "Doyle."
The point we were at was [B]you used your usual ridicule and swagger to mock us with the belief that you found evidence that Johnson drastically reduced the Israel budget. [/B]
Instead of being curious about it you show an inappropriate hostility and defensiveness that goes way beyond objective devil's advocacy and into biased agenda.
You act as if all the other evidence, like Angleton undermining JFK by supplying Israel nuclear materials, didn't exist and show [B]dedicated incuriosity instead of honest interest. Your input is intentionally mendacious on its face and proven so by its non-serious taunting manner. [/B]
David is suggesting a local Jewish Mahjong club got proactive and sought-out the Cuban exiles.
You have the entire Israeli covert infrastructure described in detail in Piper yet you are positing that these unknown jewish philanthropists walked in and miraculously funded the Cuban side of the cabal, with the intent of getting rid of Kennedy first, yet somehow miraculously never came in contact with the main cabal otherwise spelled-out on this website in infinite detail.
You can see how your forced and contrived attempt to pose those backers as being innocently motivated for Cuba only grinds against the known facts and doesn't fit in to any honestly-examined assassination scenario as it is otherwise commonly known on this site.
Note how this version of "Albert Doyle" positions the words "incuriosity" and "mendacious" in the same sentence. This, for me and others, presents as a clear case of the writer attempting to confuse the reader by utilizing a non-word that begs positive comparison with the tortured prose of the historic "Doyle" and a word that the earliest "Doyle" manifestation could not spell, let alone define.
It's all about cognitive dissonance.
Let me be blunt: If I were the all-powerful OZ of DPF as Fetzer and others mendaciously claim, "Albert Doyle" would have been banned from this site weeks ago.
The following quotes, ostensibly from the cyber pen of the historic "Albert Doyle" whose DPF posts for years were characterized by their brevity, absence of confrontational language, and utterly atrocious writing, give away the provocateurs' game.
Either more than one person is posting over the "Doyle" signature, or the historic "Doyle" was playing an equally nefarious game be posing as a semi-literate dolt in order to set up the current game.
I've added emphasis in BOLD to draw your attention to vocabulary and constructions far beyond any writing ever presented by the historic "Doyle."
The point we were at was [B]you used your usual ridicule and swagger to mock us with the belief that you found evidence that Johnson drastically reduced the Israel budget. [/B]
Instead of being curious about it you show an inappropriate hostility and defensiveness that goes way beyond objective devil's advocacy and into biased agenda.
You act as if all the other evidence, like Angleton undermining JFK by supplying Israel nuclear materials, didn't exist and show [B]dedicated incuriosity instead of honest interest. Your input is intentionally mendacious on its face and proven so by its non-serious taunting manner. [/B]
David is suggesting a local Jewish Mahjong club got proactive and sought-out the Cuban exiles.
You have the entire Israeli covert infrastructure described in detail in Piper yet you are positing that these unknown jewish philanthropists walked in and miraculously funded the Cuban side of the cabal, with the intent of getting rid of Kennedy first, yet somehow miraculously never came in contact with the main cabal otherwise spelled-out on this website in infinite detail.
You can see how your forced and contrived attempt to pose those backers as being innocently motivated for Cuba only grinds against the known facts and doesn't fit in to any honestly-examined assassination scenario as it is otherwise commonly known on this site.
Note how this version of "Albert Doyle" positions the words "incuriosity" and "mendacious" in the same sentence. This, for me and others, presents as a clear case of the writer attempting to confuse the reader by utilizing a non-word that begs positive comparison with the tortured prose of the historic "Doyle" and a word that the earliest "Doyle" manifestation could not spell, let alone define.
It's all about cognitive dissonance.
Let me be blunt: If I were the all-powerful OZ of DPF as Fetzer and others mendaciously claim, "Albert Doyle" would have been banned from this site weeks ago.