Altgens 6: Case for Alteration?

[Peter Lemkin]

why not just put a double in the window with a rifle as opposed to street level as a witness...

It seem fairly well established that no one who resembled 'Oswald' was there. It was not needed to Plan A and besides it would be a bit of an upset if the two met on on the Sixth floor or the stairs. We don't know what orders they were each given, but surely they involved actions and positioning to not meet up by accident. However, if they did, the game was over, and one was shortly to be exterminated. Things all didn't go to plan for the plotters, I see good speculation as to why, but in fact we don't know exactly - but they had to change the attack by Cuban/Russian Commies to by a Lone Nut real quick. They may well have had that Plan B ready, but it obviously was not as well planned - thus all the confusion, inconsistencies and last minute post event changes - of which there were SO many. I believe 'Oswald' was to be killed in the theater, but they called his old pal Ruby to do the job a few days later, etc. These were seasoned covert operatives running this and knew how to change plans and cover-up when things went off plan. I'm sure from the get-go they knew there would be kinks and some witnesses might have to be eliminated, the evidence tampered with or created, people threatened into lying or silence, the media controlled, possibly even that the body might need to be slightly altered. And so it all was..... IMO, if things had all gone to Plan, and the US had attacked Cuba or the USSR, the immensity of that situation would have made all the things we were/are able to observe be better obscured. The intended target was eliminated, but the Plan failed badly. They cover up still has to be ongoing in an active, even pro-active way - and is.