14-01-2013, 06:52 AM
Scott Creighton extensively discusses Judge William Sylvester's decision on James Holmes' preliminary hearing. He notes the peculiar nature of the hearing with highly charged emotional testimony from police officers that he claims would normally not be a part of such a hearing. To him, it reads like the only thing that we will see even closely resembling a trial--a trial at which his own attorney did not contest anything. Key paragraph:
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2013/01/...o-seek-it/
He has stated elsewhere that Holmes' case will disappear with a plea bargain meant to spare all the emotional difficulty of a trial. Then Holmes will vanish into never never land.
Quote:What does this mean? It means that in the biggest case in the history of the Colorado judicial system, they have absolutely no evidence that their suspect, James Holmes, committed this horrendous crime. None that would stand up in court that is.
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2013/01/...o-seek-it/
He has stated elsewhere that Holmes' case will disappear with a plea bargain meant to spare all the emotional difficulty of a trial. Then Holmes will vanish into never never land.
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl