01-02-2013, 09:16 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:What you are asking us to believe is that Pitzer was the head of the Bethesda Audio/Visual department; had installed special remote camera-operated filming equipment; had his wife say he got a phone call that afternoon and went to Bethesda, but somehow did not film the most important autopsy ever conducted at Bethesda. We are to follow the stern dictates of researchers who, like David Von Pein and Martin Hay, tell us Pitzer was not on the list of attendees while failing to grasp the most obvious clue that the reason he wasn't on that list was because he was in his office using the equipment he installed. There's only one way Dennis David could have seen an entry wound in the temple and that's if Pitzer had filmed the pre-autopsy alteration of that wound. It can't be any other way.
I think one of the worst things that could happen would be some of the best researchers becoming more effective destoyers of evidence than the intel counter-ops disinformationists themselves.
I am not asking you to believe a damned thing. I have asked a simple question:
How do you know that William Pitzer had installed remotely controlled video technology in the BNH autopsy room? This aspect is central to your thesis; presumably you are drawing on a reliable source. What is it?
Thank you.