04-02-2013, 06:43 PM
Albert Doyle Wrote:Allan Eaglesham Wrote:How do you know that William Pitzer had installed remotely controlled video technology in the BNH autopsy room? This aspect is central to your thesis; presumably you are drawing on a reliable source. What is it?
You've already given information that makes that question moot. If your point is to force a very high level of scholarship and vetting of facts I would be the first person to instantly bow to that and yield with extreme cooperation. However you are already admitting that Pitzer very likely handled the film evidence Dennis David spoke of. At that point, what difference does it make how he obtained that film? You seem to suggest that Pitzer may have personally attended the bogus 6:35 pre-autopsy. Perhaps, but if we look at the bigger picture it doesn't seem likely, as Jim himself originally said, because Pitzer wouldn't have lasted that long. If you were more true to the recorded modus operandi of the cover-up they grabbed films in Dealey Plaza instantly. Confiscating Pitzer's film of what was supposed to be a covert, wound-altering pre-autopsy would have been a simple matter of giving an order. All facts considered, I think Jim conspicuously comes up on the wrong side of his own logic. It's good to be strict with sources but some times that method can come up short against the greater facts and evidence. Another thing I should point out is that you suggest other people might have filmed the covert pre-autopsy. However you can't name them or explain why Pitzer would not be in charge of that as his being called-in showed, as well as his handling of the film afterwards. Remote filming equipment makes absolute sense seeing how being in the autopsy room would be a distraction and physical obstruction of the procedure. Lack of evidence of this afterwards also points towards the CIA's goof-up being discreetly disappeared. It's my personal feeling that you are ignoring a rather large elephant in the form of the modus operandi at Bethesda of x-ray altering, photographic evidence altering, brain swaps etc. The fact Pitzer had unadulterated film of frontal shots shows you have a lot of explaining to do vs the recorded pattern of photographic evidence tampering. Or we could jump your hoops and hurdles all day and look away from the obvious.
Mr. "Doyle":
You put words in my mouth and finesse my simple question.
As far as you are concerned, this is a case of "don't confuse me with the facts, I've already made up my mind."
So be it.