09-02-2013, 11:20 PM
Charles Drago Wrote:Allan, et al,
Herein lies the conundrum presented knowingly and with relish by "Albert Doyle"-like entities.
To ignore their coordinated efforts to disinform is to provide safe havens for their lies and sophistries and other provocations.
To respond without acknowledging their true agendas is to support their efforts by supporting the illusion that their points are, if not sound, then at least honorably offered.
To expose and excoriate them, as I and a handful of others continue to do, is to risk estrangement from true allies and friends who cannot or will not acknowledge the ongoing hostile operations.
The only effective courses of action available to us are to expose the "Doyles" wherever and whenever they appear and then ban those identities from forum access.
I understand that they will keep coming.
They should understand that we'll be waiting for them.
"Albert Doyle" is not the first agent provocateur to penetrate DPF. "He" will not be the last.
So be it.
In closing, a simple question:
Are there any DPF members willing to come forward to argue for the legitimacy of "Albert Doyle"?
Charles:
A conundrum it is.
I think that the best thing is to -- whenever possible -- expose the disinformation, e.g. regarding his silly reference to "the" movie film having been secreted in the ceiling of the TV studio in which William Pitzer's body was found. "Doyle" will probably ignore my point and/or shift the goalposts, as he has done consistently in this thread. However, those looking over our shoulders may see the repeating pattern of his behavior.