Best Spokespersons for the Truth for 50th Anniversary

[Charles Drago]

By definition, if we debate the conspiracy/LN "controversy," we lose.

The zealotry of the recently converted courses through my veins, Charles.

Here's how I formulate the issue:

Conspiracy in the murder of JFK is not a question to be debated; it's a fact to be observed, to wit: the bullet holes in the back of JFK's shirt and jacket are too low to have been associated with the throat wound.

There is NO fact-based challenge to this formulation -- only Assassination Pron.

Without commenting on the validity of the proof for which you powerfully argue, I feel that it would be a monumental error for us to place all of our eggs in any single proof-of-conspiracy basket.

And I know PRONography when I ees it!