13-02-2013, 01:28 PM
1. LONG TERM OBJECTIVES -- To reveal and remove from power the assassination's Sponsors; to energize, protect, and empower the people, who comprise the "collateral damage" of the attack on JFK, to re-take control of their political and cultural systems.
2. SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES -- To appeal to the hearts and minds of the people (not "Joe Streetcorner") so as to engender outrage and, quickly thereafter, righteous indignation, which in turn can be focused into coordinated national and eventually global campaigns of non-violent protest and political and cultural action.
3. HOW TO TELL THE TRUTH -- We must supplant the chaos that rules our "community" with the highest degree of operational discipline -- a simple (as opposed to simple-minded) strategic communications plan scrupulously adhered to and structured as follows:
STEP A -- HOW was JFK killed? In other words, agree upon and share unassailable evidence for CONSPIRACY. This must NOT be about exonerating Lee Harvey Oswald or anyone else. This must NOT be about inculpating any individuals or systems. Rather, it must be a sober, scientific presentation of evidence that demonstrates, beyond all doubt and to the degree of metaphysical certitude, that JFK was shot by two or more individuals acting in concert.
Suppressed shots from the Dal-Tex Building hit the pavement as the limousine turned from Houston onto Elm. (Robert Harris, JFKHistory Forum, videos)
Oswald's lack of cheek GSR (McKnight, Breach) removes him from the circle of shooters. Shooters were seen in the 6[SUP]th[/SUP] West and 6[SUP]th[/SUP] East of the Depository.
The Tague shot is best explained as a miss from the Dal-Tex Building.
A shot from the knoll was observed as activity by Bowers, as smoke and/or smell by Powers, O'Donnell, Yarborough, many others.
The back wound was five and 3/8 below the coat collar, five and ¾ below the shirt collar, at the third thoracic vertebra per Burkley; did not extend beyond a finger joint per Humesperhaps a show shot intended to implicate Oswald.
The throat wound was one of entry per Malcolm Perry and other physicians. This characterization so upset Elmer Moore of the Secret Service that he badgered Perry all Friday night. Specter and Dulles would pile on. The expert who was very familiar with gunshot wounds was forced to recant by those who were agenda-driven.
The head wound was "a simple matter of a bullet through the brain" demonstrated by Kilduff per Perry's description. This location was that of a small hole seen by several, filled by mortician Thom Robinson with "a little wax."
This trajectory is described by Sherry Fiester using modern forensic techniques she is familiar with by profession. Trajectory analysis, backspatter analysis, headwound physics observed.
The rear exit described by forty blowing the right hemisphere out a baseball-sized hole came from a frontal entry.
As there were shots from the rear (to the back) and from the front (head, neck) and Oswald did not shoot, the official hypothesis is falseand knowingly so, as the trail of suppressed evidence and testimony is wide and deep and foul.
QED conspiracy, crossfire, coverup.
Dr. David Mantik has done extensive and compelling work to demonstrate forgery in the extant record, in furtherance of an understanding of the true nature of the wounds.
STEP B -- Provide and explain a working model of the conspiracy. For the purposes of this mini-essay, I propose the Sponsor/Facilitator/Mechanic model in its entirety (including sub-categories).
The sponsor(s) were the unknown centers of power wishing to preserve Cold War tension, perpetual war, primacy of Federal Reserve, tension of nuclear arms race, resource exploitation, in sum, perpetuation of conditions conducive to exploitation for profit/power.
The facilitators would be those perennially involved in such matters as regime change, false flag operations, psychological warfare, covert movement of assassins, arms, drugs as barter.
The mechanics would be professionals of unquestionable competence, discretion, loyalty or in the alternative, expendibility.
False sponsors would present as a Who's Who of a thousand garish books and a horror show of bias, bigotry, misdirection and imbecility.
STEP C -- WHO killed JFK? This question is best answered by REVERSE-ENGINEERING the shooting. WHO could have done it the way it was done? Who could have stripped security? Who could have selected the motorcade route? Who could have selected the perfect patsy? Who could have covered up the conspiracy and protected its Sponsors and Facilitators? The best rhetorical device to answer these questions might be to ask, "Who could NOT have done these things as they were done?" Or, if you prefer, "Who did NOT have the means AND motive AND opportunity to do the deed as it was done?"
A typical sponsor might be a David Rockefeller, but more likely a person or persons of similar power yet unknown to the pages of the paper of record. A sponsor could not be an ad hoc favorite of popular conjecture, e.g., Johnson, Hoover, Marcello, KGB, Castro, Mossad.
The motorcade ambush was used on Heydrich by British intelligence training the two Czechs.
Secret Service approved the route. Emery Roberts pulled agents off the limo at Love. Greer hit the brakes. Someone likely in the Secret Service halved the motorcycle escort and moved them back; put the limo out front. Removed McHugh from the front seat. Recall it was the Secret Service who had the builder remove the privacy window in 1961.
The patsy was provided by CIA, probably Angleton who John Newman says manipulated Oswald's file. The defection, the FPCC provocations, the backyard photos, the multiple Oswalds usually wildly belligerent (Odio incident) were Phillips' and Joannides' Cuban organizations at workwith full use of Banister the "former" intelligence agent.
Many powerful figures and organizations either had developed animosity toward the murdered president (or his brother who would now be powerless) or stood to gain from his death. Briefly, Johnson differed on foreign policy, and would have been dropped from the ticket to face trial on Bobby Baker and Billy Sol Estes crimes; Hoover would have been forcibly retiredand despised both brothers. Dulles of course was fired from his life's work by a man he held in the deepest contempt. Military leaders reviled the weak sister. Cubans swore oaths against their betrayer. Mafia lords cursed him in English, Sicilian, Italian.
All those and more are false sponsors.
For the coverup has outlived Johnson, Hoover, Nixon, and will outlive the hated Bushas it did the hated Helms.
The innermost power of the CIA as sword and shield of the cabal, wherein the agency per se is always in total plausible denial while operatives move from that center of power to each and every agency and branch of military service, always in service to power.
STEP D -- WHY was JFK killed?
James Douglass has John F. Kennedy answer this for us. The anecdote of the reading of Seven Days in May, and subsequent response to a friend's query, "Could it happen here." JFK said yes if the young president made a Bay of Pigs blunder, then another, say not going to war in the missile crisis, then pursuing peace too zealously, et cetera.
The key editorial of the time was that the Seven Days in May would come from CIA not the Pentagon.
The regime change model used for economic exploitation utilized CIA, Green Berets, helicopters, napalm, pacification, diplomatic machinations, economic pressures.
So the powerful sponsor could use intelligence, military and government assets to get its way.
JFK stood in its way and was killed. This is the takeaway of Unspeakable, of Battling Wall Street, of Thy Will Be Done.
The Vietnam War had to be foughtbut JFK was in the way. The war profits, the access to drugs of the Golden Triangle, the other resource exploitiation, the mind set of the Cold War business model, all demanded death to the king.
Add that the test ban and backchannel détente and demarche attempts were offensive to the hawks, and the threat to the Fed was a mortal sin, and the threat to the power of the CIA through NSAMs 55, 56, 57 and the oath to shatter it and scatter it to the windall this was weighing heavily on the minds of the sponsors and key facilitators who'd been operating as Dylan's Masters of War ("you play with my world like it's your little toy").
STEP E -- How should we define "justice" in this case?
Justice would be a Gallup poll showing the overwhelming majority of Americans had come to the realization that the twin towers of power manipulation were the forced wars in Vietnam and Iraq/Afghanistan, to force trade in arms, oil, drugs, and to tighten the strategy of tension as a garrot on the free spirit of mankind.
2. SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES -- To appeal to the hearts and minds of the people (not "Joe Streetcorner") so as to engender outrage and, quickly thereafter, righteous indignation, which in turn can be focused into coordinated national and eventually global campaigns of non-violent protest and political and cultural action.
3. HOW TO TELL THE TRUTH -- We must supplant the chaos that rules our "community" with the highest degree of operational discipline -- a simple (as opposed to simple-minded) strategic communications plan scrupulously adhered to and structured as follows:
STEP A -- HOW was JFK killed? In other words, agree upon and share unassailable evidence for CONSPIRACY. This must NOT be about exonerating Lee Harvey Oswald or anyone else. This must NOT be about inculpating any individuals or systems. Rather, it must be a sober, scientific presentation of evidence that demonstrates, beyond all doubt and to the degree of metaphysical certitude, that JFK was shot by two or more individuals acting in concert.
Suppressed shots from the Dal-Tex Building hit the pavement as the limousine turned from Houston onto Elm. (Robert Harris, JFKHistory Forum, videos)
Oswald's lack of cheek GSR (McKnight, Breach) removes him from the circle of shooters. Shooters were seen in the 6[SUP]th[/SUP] West and 6[SUP]th[/SUP] East of the Depository.
The Tague shot is best explained as a miss from the Dal-Tex Building.
A shot from the knoll was observed as activity by Bowers, as smoke and/or smell by Powers, O'Donnell, Yarborough, many others.
The back wound was five and 3/8 below the coat collar, five and ¾ below the shirt collar, at the third thoracic vertebra per Burkley; did not extend beyond a finger joint per Humesperhaps a show shot intended to implicate Oswald.
The throat wound was one of entry per Malcolm Perry and other physicians. This characterization so upset Elmer Moore of the Secret Service that he badgered Perry all Friday night. Specter and Dulles would pile on. The expert who was very familiar with gunshot wounds was forced to recant by those who were agenda-driven.
The head wound was "a simple matter of a bullet through the brain" demonstrated by Kilduff per Perry's description. This location was that of a small hole seen by several, filled by mortician Thom Robinson with "a little wax."
This trajectory is described by Sherry Fiester using modern forensic techniques she is familiar with by profession. Trajectory analysis, backspatter analysis, headwound physics observed.
The rear exit described by forty blowing the right hemisphere out a baseball-sized hole came from a frontal entry.
As there were shots from the rear (to the back) and from the front (head, neck) and Oswald did not shoot, the official hypothesis is falseand knowingly so, as the trail of suppressed evidence and testimony is wide and deep and foul.
QED conspiracy, crossfire, coverup.
Dr. David Mantik has done extensive and compelling work to demonstrate forgery in the extant record, in furtherance of an understanding of the true nature of the wounds.
STEP B -- Provide and explain a working model of the conspiracy. For the purposes of this mini-essay, I propose the Sponsor/Facilitator/Mechanic model in its entirety (including sub-categories).
The sponsor(s) were the unknown centers of power wishing to preserve Cold War tension, perpetual war, primacy of Federal Reserve, tension of nuclear arms race, resource exploitation, in sum, perpetuation of conditions conducive to exploitation for profit/power.
The facilitators would be those perennially involved in such matters as regime change, false flag operations, psychological warfare, covert movement of assassins, arms, drugs as barter.
The mechanics would be professionals of unquestionable competence, discretion, loyalty or in the alternative, expendibility.
False sponsors would present as a Who's Who of a thousand garish books and a horror show of bias, bigotry, misdirection and imbecility.
STEP C -- WHO killed JFK? This question is best answered by REVERSE-ENGINEERING the shooting. WHO could have done it the way it was done? Who could have stripped security? Who could have selected the motorcade route? Who could have selected the perfect patsy? Who could have covered up the conspiracy and protected its Sponsors and Facilitators? The best rhetorical device to answer these questions might be to ask, "Who could NOT have done these things as they were done?" Or, if you prefer, "Who did NOT have the means AND motive AND opportunity to do the deed as it was done?"
A typical sponsor might be a David Rockefeller, but more likely a person or persons of similar power yet unknown to the pages of the paper of record. A sponsor could not be an ad hoc favorite of popular conjecture, e.g., Johnson, Hoover, Marcello, KGB, Castro, Mossad.
The motorcade ambush was used on Heydrich by British intelligence training the two Czechs.
Secret Service approved the route. Emery Roberts pulled agents off the limo at Love. Greer hit the brakes. Someone likely in the Secret Service halved the motorcycle escort and moved them back; put the limo out front. Removed McHugh from the front seat. Recall it was the Secret Service who had the builder remove the privacy window in 1961.
The patsy was provided by CIA, probably Angleton who John Newman says manipulated Oswald's file. The defection, the FPCC provocations, the backyard photos, the multiple Oswalds usually wildly belligerent (Odio incident) were Phillips' and Joannides' Cuban organizations at workwith full use of Banister the "former" intelligence agent.
Many powerful figures and organizations either had developed animosity toward the murdered president (or his brother who would now be powerless) or stood to gain from his death. Briefly, Johnson differed on foreign policy, and would have been dropped from the ticket to face trial on Bobby Baker and Billy Sol Estes crimes; Hoover would have been forcibly retiredand despised both brothers. Dulles of course was fired from his life's work by a man he held in the deepest contempt. Military leaders reviled the weak sister. Cubans swore oaths against their betrayer. Mafia lords cursed him in English, Sicilian, Italian.
All those and more are false sponsors.
For the coverup has outlived Johnson, Hoover, Nixon, and will outlive the hated Bushas it did the hated Helms.
The innermost power of the CIA as sword and shield of the cabal, wherein the agency per se is always in total plausible denial while operatives move from that center of power to each and every agency and branch of military service, always in service to power.
STEP D -- WHY was JFK killed?
James Douglass has John F. Kennedy answer this for us. The anecdote of the reading of Seven Days in May, and subsequent response to a friend's query, "Could it happen here." JFK said yes if the young president made a Bay of Pigs blunder, then another, say not going to war in the missile crisis, then pursuing peace too zealously, et cetera.
The key editorial of the time was that the Seven Days in May would come from CIA not the Pentagon.
The regime change model used for economic exploitation utilized CIA, Green Berets, helicopters, napalm, pacification, diplomatic machinations, economic pressures.
So the powerful sponsor could use intelligence, military and government assets to get its way.
JFK stood in its way and was killed. This is the takeaway of Unspeakable, of Battling Wall Street, of Thy Will Be Done.
The Vietnam War had to be foughtbut JFK was in the way. The war profits, the access to drugs of the Golden Triangle, the other resource exploitiation, the mind set of the Cold War business model, all demanded death to the king.
Add that the test ban and backchannel détente and demarche attempts were offensive to the hawks, and the threat to the Fed was a mortal sin, and the threat to the power of the CIA through NSAMs 55, 56, 57 and the oath to shatter it and scatter it to the windall this was weighing heavily on the minds of the sponsors and key facilitators who'd been operating as Dylan's Masters of War ("you play with my world like it's your little toy").
STEP E -- How should we define "justice" in this case?
Justice would be a Gallup poll showing the overwhelming majority of Americans had come to the realization that the twin towers of power manipulation were the forced wars in Vietnam and Iraq/Afghanistan, to force trade in arms, oil, drugs, and to tighten the strategy of tension as a garrot on the free spirit of mankind.