14-02-2013, 01:44 AM
I read Allan's review of the Heiner book and thought it was fair.
Jim essentially bases his treatment of the subject on Denis David and Heiner.
And Heiner is largely reliant on Marvin, until they had an apparent falling out.
But Allan has continued to work on the Pitzer case until he has accumulated what I think is the most current repository of info on it.
Jim essentially bases his treatment of the subject on Denis David and Heiner.
And Heiner is largely reliant on Marvin, until they had an apparent falling out.
But Allan has continued to work on the Pitzer case until he has accumulated what I think is the most current repository of info on it.