23-02-2013, 01:03 PM
Hi! My name is Cliff...and I'm an Assassination Pornography addict.
["Hi Cliff"]
I want to thank the Deep Politics Forum and its co-founders for allowing me to establish the first branch of Assassination Porn Anonymous here at DPF.
I'm thinking about asking Charles to be my sponsor. Back in my days of making Assassination Porn I used to make fun of people who disagreed with me -- one flicker of 'tude from someone and off went the snark! The only redeeming value of my work was the ridicule I heaped on those who say and write stupid things about the JFK assassination. I want to assure Charles that while I refuse to debate the fact of conspiracy any more, the ridicule of those who disagree with me on this issue will not surcease.
I called this APA meeting today -- our inaugural -- because...well...frankly I'm having a few white knuckle moments when I go over to the EF and see so-called CTs saying stupid things and asking stupid questions about the back wound, the clothing evidence and the Dealey Plaza photos. Assassination Porn. Distorting the record. Engaging a blatant liar as if he had an argument!! (breathe...breathe...)...
I've only read a few posts. I'm not going there, to the EF. I'm not going back. Out of the 4 CTs I see posting on the Back Wound thread the only one holding his mud, near as I can tell, is Fetzer when he says the issue is settled -- the back wound is at T3.
Thank you Jim, no further questions on the subject of the T3 back wound. Anyone who questions the issue is insufficiently familiar with the evidence and betrays an ignorance of the root facts of JFK's murder.
Hey guys, you can't "argue" with bald faced liars! Even some of our leading lights would do well with an APA meeting.
Thank you for letting me share.
I'll be back...
["Hi Cliff"]
I want to thank the Deep Politics Forum and its co-founders for allowing me to establish the first branch of Assassination Porn Anonymous here at DPF.
I'm thinking about asking Charles to be my sponsor. Back in my days of making Assassination Porn I used to make fun of people who disagreed with me -- one flicker of 'tude from someone and off went the snark! The only redeeming value of my work was the ridicule I heaped on those who say and write stupid things about the JFK assassination. I want to assure Charles that while I refuse to debate the fact of conspiracy any more, the ridicule of those who disagree with me on this issue will not surcease.
I called this APA meeting today -- our inaugural -- because...well...frankly I'm having a few white knuckle moments when I go over to the EF and see so-called CTs saying stupid things and asking stupid questions about the back wound, the clothing evidence and the Dealey Plaza photos. Assassination Porn. Distorting the record. Engaging a blatant liar as if he had an argument!! (breathe...breathe...)...
I've only read a few posts. I'm not going there, to the EF. I'm not going back. Out of the 4 CTs I see posting on the Back Wound thread the only one holding his mud, near as I can tell, is Fetzer when he says the issue is settled -- the back wound is at T3.
Thank you Jim, no further questions on the subject of the T3 back wound. Anyone who questions the issue is insufficiently familiar with the evidence and betrays an ignorance of the root facts of JFK's murder.
Hey guys, you can't "argue" with bald faced liars! Even some of our leading lights would do well with an APA meeting.
Thank you for letting me share.
I'll be back...