23-02-2013, 02:53 PM
Charles Drago Wrote:Assassination Porn -- lending new definition to the term "money shot."
We're having fun with this Charles, but I'm not kidding about white knuckling over the nonsense posted at the EF .
Now Fetzer is saying the Croft photo is altered? He's buying some insane non sequitur?
[recite serenity prayer]
All the pet theorists jump in to declare the issue in doubt. I have found this phenomenon fascinating since I first noticed it in 1997 -- the willingness of "CTs" to declare the location of the back wound in doubt.
For a long time I didn't get it.
It's T3 Denial. Pure and simple.
Now, I don't think T3 Denial is on par with Holocaust Denial. Those who deny the holocaust tend to be anti-semetic.
Those who question/challenge JFK's back wound location tend to be researchers married to their pet theories. The T3 back wound threatens lots of pet theories. It forecloses further debate as to the fact of conspiracy, therefore it forecloses on the glory some researchers feel when they develop "The Case for Conspiracy" on ground other than the T3 back wound.
That's why a whole lot of CTs are closet Lamsonites.
Poor bastards...

