26-02-2013, 02:49 AM
Am I "universally shunned by conspiracy advocates"?
Have I described myself as a "chief spokesperson" for any group?
Care to share specifics, mate?
Wow Charles, as others said, Seamus was referring to Fetzer. Whew, calm down.
And I don't think its a crap thread. I mean what has happened to Fetzer is really something I think. Maybe we can take it back even further than Baker. We may be able to take it back to his incredibly incendiary blood feud with Tink Thompson over the Z film.
In the 9-11 field, which I do not follow that closely, I was not aware of what he was doing until Joe Green told me about the whole Judy Wood, dustification, giant hologram idea.
But the question is: Why was Fetzer attracted to these extremes? Which were not at all necessary to prove conspiracy? And why did he maintain them?
I think its a waste of a talented guy who could have done some real good.
Have I described myself as a "chief spokesperson" for any group?
Care to share specifics, mate?
Wow Charles, as others said, Seamus was referring to Fetzer. Whew, calm down.
And I don't think its a crap thread. I mean what has happened to Fetzer is really something I think. Maybe we can take it back even further than Baker. We may be able to take it back to his incredibly incendiary blood feud with Tink Thompson over the Z film.
In the 9-11 field, which I do not follow that closely, I was not aware of what he was doing until Joe Green told me about the whole Judy Wood, dustification, giant hologram idea.
But the question is: Why was Fetzer attracted to these extremes? Which were not at all necessary to prove conspiracy? And why did he maintain them?
I think its a waste of a talented guy who could have done some real good.