You can't win with a racist. But I'm trying anyhow: Could I get a little help here?

[Max Blair]

We can manage members with autism, we already have some, but not members who don't do their basic research. None of us have the time to do that for others. We are busy with our own projects.

I am sorry to have given you the impression that I am not sufficiently well informed to post here. It seems I've gotten off on the wrong foot with just about everybody who's responded to me. I am especially sorry to seem to alienate you, as it was one of your posts discovered in one of my many Google Searches on this topic that led me here. If I started with some very basic questions, it was because I was trying to get a feel for what really is out there after a long tango in deep darkness. I am triply sorry if you think I have wasted your time.

Now there is another source your friend can read up on, Lewontin, who doesn't believe in genetic determinism. Lot's of peer reviewed articles for his work and he is accepted as a real scientist by his peers in the non-Pioneer Fund funded world of science.

What is your opinion of the AWF Edwards 2003 Challenge to Lewontin, that gives us the adage "Lewontin's Fallacy?" My friend thinks Edwards thoroughly discredits Lewontin.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12879450

Look at who Rushton's peers are. There are about 10 of them that give glowing reviews of each others works. A circle jerk off. This is how the Neo-cons work too. Please look at Adam Curtis' blog entry on TINA to see how it is done.

That blog entry looks really interesting and useful on a quick once over. Thank you especially for this.