08-03-2013, 04:59 AM
Thanks CHarles.
And BTW, you may be right about whoever "Albert Doyle" is.
Because he doesn't even understand Janney's pastiche.
Or he would not have written what he just did.
See, according to Janney, Crump did not have to be MK/Ultra'd at all. Since he was completely innocent.
I don't know how one can validate an hypothesis, even one as wild as Janney's, if you don't understand it.
And BTW, you may be right about whoever "Albert Doyle" is.
Because he doesn't even understand Janney's pastiche.
Or he would not have written what he just did.
See, according to Janney, Crump did not have to be MK/Ultra'd at all. Since he was completely innocent.
I don't know how one can validate an hypothesis, even one as wild as Janney's, if you don't understand it.