08-03-2013, 11:02 PM
This thread is about the BYP and evidence supporting it being fake....
Most arguments AGAINST say nothing about the mismatched hands nor have I ever seen a graphic illustrate it as I posted.
I had NEVER seen the comparison of the BYP hand and the Japan Oswald... they are virtually identical... if THAT was really LEE (in Japan AND the BYP), which I believe... how does that fit your DP world
and why didn't you make THAT connection?
Peter, believe it or not... YOU are not the only one reading these things... Lurkers and guests interested in background info and visual representation of OUR foregone conclusions DESERVE a decent place to hang their hats....
Before one can contribute to the DP angle, one must be sure.. So many here dismiss skepticism as supporting the ongoing WCR fallacy.
With attitudes like yours it's no wonder "unconvinced" people shy away.... you might as well just state... "if you dont drink the kool-aid, we dont want to talk to you and/or you are simply too stupid to be bothered with.... or you're on THEIR side"
You think I'm on THEIR side cause I like to clarify a few things for those not entirely sure? Reminds me of a thread entitled: "Why do the CTs eat their young?"
Would you simply rather have whoever doesn't SEE THE LIGHT lined up and shot
or degraded as you've done here to me?
Pointless? Then dont bother commenting, find a thread you DO feel is worthwhile and have at it....
whatever you decide... do NOT put words into my mouth or posts that were never there....
and learn a little tolerance for other people's areas of interest....
Thanks...
btw - once again ... THANKS PHIL. :wavey:
Most arguments AGAINST say nothing about the mismatched hands nor have I ever seen a graphic illustrate it as I posted.
I had NEVER seen the comparison of the BYP hand and the Japan Oswald... they are virtually identical... if THAT was really LEE (in Japan AND the BYP), which I believe... how does that fit your DP world
and why didn't you make THAT connection?
Peter, believe it or not... YOU are not the only one reading these things... Lurkers and guests interested in background info and visual representation of OUR foregone conclusions DESERVE a decent place to hang their hats....
Before one can contribute to the DP angle, one must be sure.. So many here dismiss skepticism as supporting the ongoing WCR fallacy.
With attitudes like yours it's no wonder "unconvinced" people shy away.... you might as well just state... "if you dont drink the kool-aid, we dont want to talk to you and/or you are simply too stupid to be bothered with.... or you're on THEIR side"
You think I'm on THEIR side cause I like to clarify a few things for those not entirely sure? Reminds me of a thread entitled: "Why do the CTs eat their young?"
Would you simply rather have whoever doesn't SEE THE LIGHT lined up and shot
or degraded as you've done here to me?
Pointless? Then dont bother commenting, find a thread you DO feel is worthwhile and have at it....
whatever you decide... do NOT put words into my mouth or posts that were never there....
and learn a little tolerance for other people's areas of interest....
Thanks...
btw - once again ... THANKS PHIL. :wavey: