11-03-2013, 08:39 AM
(This post was last modified: 11-03-2013, 01:27 PM by Peter Lemkin.)
While good researchers have and continue to speak at Lancer, the whole existence of Lancer has never sat well with me. It has always seemed like a divide and control operation...very subtle. Don't mean to divert the thread [the Amnesty idea was a great one!], but what is Lancer's role in the official 50th celebrations, if any?
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws. - Mayer Rothschild
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass
"Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience! People are obedient in the face of poverty, starvation, stupidity, war, and cruelty. Our problem is that grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem!" - Howard Zinn
"If there is no struggle there is no progress. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and never will" - Frederick Douglass