01-04-2013, 11:05 PM
Farley says he isn't holding Ralph Yates accountable for giving precise details 2 days prior to the assassination but then turns around and does exactly that. Right now he's fishing for evidence that Yates culled his curtain rod story from news reports after the assassination. But this doesn't answer what has already been shown. That Yates would have no reason to detail the precise dimensions of the package on the 20th. The simple explanation is that on the 20th Yates believed the ringer and thought they were curtain rods. On the 20th the fact the hitch-hiker possessed a package of curtain rods was irrelevant to the reason why Yates told Jones about this event. On the 20th Yates' motive was to tell Dempsey Jones that a weird hitch-hiker had struck-up the exact same conversation he had with Jones. An explanation of the precise details of the package would be irrelevant to Yates' motive at the time. So while exploiting this minimal description of the package on the 20th Lee then tries to assert the detailed description of curtains rods was due to news reports instead of Yates having the seriousness of what he witnessed dawn upon him.
But this all comes down to the lie detector test Farley ignores. One has to imagine that by the 5th interview FBI asked questions about all Yates' claims, including the curtain rods, similar appearance to Oswald, and other additional details. According to the FBI agent who pulled Dorothy Yates aside Ralph passed the test on these questions, therefore proving he had actually witnessed those events as described. Farley is stalling on this because he knows it seriously doesn't work for his doubting theories. However any honest appraisal of what we already know sees the extraordinary set of key critical factors precludes any need to dally with attempts to show Yates got his information from news reports. We've already shown Yates possessed knowledge of things that couldn't have come from any news reports that Farley ignores.
It's also extremely low to use FBI's dirty tactics in the matter of Yates family mental health history. Farley never answered how Yates could have no mention of this mental history on his Butcher Supply Company record prior to this event? The truth is Yates perfectly conforms to how a person with such a family history would progressively react to criminal FBI pressure tactics. To try to take the exact side of FBI in these criminal tactics and blame Yates for their results is criminal in itself. They were breaking Yates with intent and found an easy way to do it and easy excuse to account for it. Not seeing that is shameful in my opinion. Funny how Yates' commitment occurred right after his passing the polygraph.
But this all comes down to the lie detector test Farley ignores. One has to imagine that by the 5th interview FBI asked questions about all Yates' claims, including the curtain rods, similar appearance to Oswald, and other additional details. According to the FBI agent who pulled Dorothy Yates aside Ralph passed the test on these questions, therefore proving he had actually witnessed those events as described. Farley is stalling on this because he knows it seriously doesn't work for his doubting theories. However any honest appraisal of what we already know sees the extraordinary set of key critical factors precludes any need to dally with attempts to show Yates got his information from news reports. We've already shown Yates possessed knowledge of things that couldn't have come from any news reports that Farley ignores.
It's also extremely low to use FBI's dirty tactics in the matter of Yates family mental health history. Farley never answered how Yates could have no mention of this mental history on his Butcher Supply Company record prior to this event? The truth is Yates perfectly conforms to how a person with such a family history would progressively react to criminal FBI pressure tactics. To try to take the exact side of FBI in these criminal tactics and blame Yates for their results is criminal in itself. They were breaking Yates with intent and found an easy way to do it and easy excuse to account for it. Not seeing that is shameful in my opinion. Funny how Yates' commitment occurred right after his passing the polygraph.