02-04-2013, 02:06 AM
You have to understand bureaucratic doubletalk when viewing these documents. Farley is apparently completely tone deaf to the fact the statement "Yates showed no emotional response to these questions" is just another way of saying "Yates registered truthful reactions to all these questions".
If you know how a polygraph works it detects the body's physical reactions or "emotional responses". So for them to say Yates showed no emotional responses is just another way of saying the test showed he wasn't lying. It is a way of lying about his positive results without having to go to hell.
Get it?
Those trying to find out the dates of information release for the details of Yates' story are just dawdling against the obvious. Notice they haven't found anything yet? I'll give you a hint. They never will.
This is the point where Charles Drago would advise not to prolong the discussion. And I think he'd be right.
If you know how a polygraph works it detects the body's physical reactions or "emotional responses". So for them to say Yates showed no emotional responses is just another way of saying the test showed he wasn't lying. It is a way of lying about his positive results without having to go to hell.
Get it?
Those trying to find out the dates of information release for the details of Yates' story are just dawdling against the obvious. Notice they haven't found anything yet? I'll give you a hint. They never will.
This is the point where Charles Drago would advise not to prolong the discussion. And I think he'd be right.