02-04-2013, 04:14 PM
A smart researcher will see the skeletal framework of what happened with Yates' polygraph in the form of how it was presented. FBI is operating under a covert overriding directive to bury any and all counter-official story information. This is a need-to-know national security matter so the agents don't question the motives or purpose. Hypothetically the FBI agents involved may have been lied to and told they were assigned to prevent leaks on a communist operation that had successfully assassinated the president. With this directive in mind they have a witness who strongly insists he witnessed a conspirator and won't back off his story. Truthful investigation of this witnessing will unavoidably expose the plot.
The FBI then gives this witness a polygraph that indicates he is telling the truth. According to FBI law the covert national security directive then overrides this normal procedure. With this mentality in mind the FBI agents therefore feel they are given license to exert this national security order over normal rule of law ethics. They know that lying about the true results of the polygraph is a pretty serious legal offense so they have to cloak their deception in language that will let them get away with outright lying while not damning themselves.
You can see from the bureaucratic doubletalk they used that they didn't quite want to condemn themselves by their own words by directly lying that the test showed Yates wasn't telling the truth. The polygraph senses stress and body reactions caused by a person who is trying to pass-off something he knows isn't true. The truth flows and lies take some effort to construct and avoid natural guilt over. A lie will cause muscle tightening, increased breathing, and other nervous responses that register at the electronic sensor level as the mind worries about incriminating conflicts and getting caught. This can generally be called "emotional responses". Meanwhile a truthful person is relaxed and casual and feels no reasons for stress when answering the questions. This shows up on the polygraph as relaxed chart lines that flow without any wiggles.
So FBI had a problem where it needed to construct semantics that would satisfy their need to obey their national security orders while not directly lying about the true test results. The simple answer was to use the wording "Yates showed no emotional responses to the questions". In other words Yates showed no wiggles or stress reactions to the questions. His chart lines flowed smoothly without any observable reactions. In a very perverted interpretation of the results FBI said the results were "inconclusive". Yes, this is factual if one is viewing them in terms of trying to find proof Yates was lying as Hoover indicated they had failed to do with an investigation of his whereabouts. - All factual and truthful if viewed through the multifaceted viewpoint of the room full of mirrors...
Once you understand this basic thing and its relationship to Yates' story you realize it confirms he was telling the truth.
On the covert chessboard polygraph checkmates all other lesser moves...
The FBI then gives this witness a polygraph that indicates he is telling the truth. According to FBI law the covert national security directive then overrides this normal procedure. With this mentality in mind the FBI agents therefore feel they are given license to exert this national security order over normal rule of law ethics. They know that lying about the true results of the polygraph is a pretty serious legal offense so they have to cloak their deception in language that will let them get away with outright lying while not damning themselves.
You can see from the bureaucratic doubletalk they used that they didn't quite want to condemn themselves by their own words by directly lying that the test showed Yates wasn't telling the truth. The polygraph senses stress and body reactions caused by a person who is trying to pass-off something he knows isn't true. The truth flows and lies take some effort to construct and avoid natural guilt over. A lie will cause muscle tightening, increased breathing, and other nervous responses that register at the electronic sensor level as the mind worries about incriminating conflicts and getting caught. This can generally be called "emotional responses". Meanwhile a truthful person is relaxed and casual and feels no reasons for stress when answering the questions. This shows up on the polygraph as relaxed chart lines that flow without any wiggles.
So FBI had a problem where it needed to construct semantics that would satisfy their need to obey their national security orders while not directly lying about the true test results. The simple answer was to use the wording "Yates showed no emotional responses to the questions". In other words Yates showed no wiggles or stress reactions to the questions. His chart lines flowed smoothly without any observable reactions. In a very perverted interpretation of the results FBI said the results were "inconclusive". Yes, this is factual if one is viewing them in terms of trying to find proof Yates was lying as Hoover indicated they had failed to do with an investigation of his whereabouts. - All factual and truthful if viewed through the multifaceted viewpoint of the room full of mirrors...
Once you understand this basic thing and its relationship to Yates' story you realize it confirms he was telling the truth.
On the covert chessboard polygraph checkmates all other lesser moves...