22-04-2013, 02:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 22-04-2013, 10:43 PM by Jim Hackett II.)
I have HT and HT2. I value them.
I value Killing Kennedy for some of the "Pre-Fetz" ZToon sections.
As flammable as both authors are I find myself drawing a line.
But all the others by HL I have read I do not value.
I find it more productive to disagree than to disagree and attack.
Credit where due,
HT brought my interest back to life at a time when I though I was
oh so burned out on all of it.
Marr's Crossfire too in that day before the film Oliver Stone made.
I guess by the time I read Reasonable Doubt I found I was not so burned out after all.
The hangover from the HSCA breach of faith redux was over.
Then Hollywood came to town...
And Thanks Phil and Jim for saving me the bucks at least on this HL job.
I value Killing Kennedy for some of the "Pre-Fetz" ZToon sections.
As flammable as both authors are I find myself drawing a line.
But all the others by HL I have read I do not value.
I find it more productive to disagree than to disagree and attack.
Credit where due,
HT brought my interest back to life at a time when I though I was
oh so burned out on all of it.
Marr's Crossfire too in that day before the film Oliver Stone made.
I guess by the time I read Reasonable Doubt I found I was not so burned out after all.
The hangover from the HSCA breach of faith redux was over.
Then Hollywood came to town...
And Thanks Phil and Jim for saving me the bucks at least on this HL job.
Read not to contradict and confute;
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON