30-04-2013, 08:42 PM
(This post was last modified: 30-04-2013, 09:08 PM by Jim Hackett II.)
No Mr Hackett. You were specifically asked to back your view via my points.
I think most honest people could see you couldn't do that besides appealing to hiding behind the protection of groups which is kind of intellectually cowardly isn't it? Honest debaters can back their points on their own Jim. You couldn't. Thanks.[/QUOTE]
What a laugh.:finger::finger::finger:
You have problems beyond help found here "Albert".
Enjoy your life "Albert", but ya gotta do it without my help or participation in your BULLSHIT as above.
Because I maintain an open mind on this issue, then I can't defend my beliefs. Psycho-babble bullshit. Wish it were true all you want.
Hell son, that shot didn't even hit paper and likely went wild over the top of the butts. A REAL MAGGIE'S DRAWER'S BOY.
No points for that shit. Albert. Jerked another round eh.
Your post again demonstrates what you are and whom you serve. - Contention is your only product. You arrive mind made up and dictate bullshit everywhere I have ever encountered your persona no matter the name posted under.
I arrive to learn, but you can't absorb that from the above can you.
I ain't got time for the bullshit.
You just confirmed AGAIN the opinion of the majority of participants here, you are full of bullshit and I don't have time to "play" with fools. I stand in good company I would say.
The attending issues of real Deep Politics are too important to waste time on junk contention as a final product of efforts. Nor do I have time to dedicate to further reply to provocation from the likes of you "Albert".
Comm-Link Closed, sorry "Albert". Too bad, too sad. You Lose.
I bet you are buddies with Larry Dunkel, he promotes confusion and contention too and does a better job than you do "Albert". I smell a robot.
I think most honest people could see you couldn't do that besides appealing to hiding behind the protection of groups which is kind of intellectually cowardly isn't it? Honest debaters can back their points on their own Jim. You couldn't. Thanks.[/QUOTE]
What a laugh.:finger::finger::finger:
You have problems beyond help found here "Albert".
Enjoy your life "Albert", but ya gotta do it without my help or participation in your BULLSHIT as above.
Because I maintain an open mind on this issue, then I can't defend my beliefs. Psycho-babble bullshit. Wish it were true all you want.
Hell son, that shot didn't even hit paper and likely went wild over the top of the butts. A REAL MAGGIE'S DRAWER'S BOY.
No points for that shit. Albert. Jerked another round eh.
Your post again demonstrates what you are and whom you serve. - Contention is your only product. You arrive mind made up and dictate bullshit everywhere I have ever encountered your persona no matter the name posted under.
I arrive to learn, but you can't absorb that from the above can you.
I ain't got time for the bullshit.
You just confirmed AGAIN the opinion of the majority of participants here, you are full of bullshit and I don't have time to "play" with fools. I stand in good company I would say.
The attending issues of real Deep Politics are too important to waste time on junk contention as a final product of efforts. Nor do I have time to dedicate to further reply to provocation from the likes of you "Albert".
Comm-Link Closed, sorry "Albert". Too bad, too sad. You Lose.
I bet you are buddies with Larry Dunkel, he promotes confusion and contention too and does a better job than you do "Albert". I smell a robot.
Read not to contradict and confute;
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON
nor to believe and take for granted;
nor to find talk and discourse;
but to weigh and consider.
FRANCIS BACON