11-05-2013, 12:29 AM
Danny Jarman Wrote:Magda Hassan Wrote:Danny Jarman Wrote:http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/...350602.htmFor sure Danny. Many powers do benefit form a destabilised Pakistan, India, the UK and US just for starters. It is a pawn in the great game. Then are internal players who also benefit from retention of their feudal privileges. But most Pakistanis have a terrible time of all this. Do you see Musharaff as likely behind this or are there others too?
It's in everyones interest to destabilise Pakistan and to stop it advancing as a country. As long as the foreign money keeps pouring in blood will continue to be spilled.
Aren't Musharaff, the ISI and the US all in cohorts? I see them as one and the same
I fear a similar fate for Imran Khan who is gaining more political ground and popularity by the day.
Yes, to a large extent that is the case. And Imran Khan is the biggest threat to that racket.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.