14-06-2013, 07:08 PM
What better way to hide in plain sight than to CREATE a version of the best evidence and insure that everyone in the room viewing such a version be bound to a military oath of silence.
Surely there were those in that autopsy room who shook their collective heads and said "No way it happened like that"... More sinister is the implication that those trusted with producing such a document upon which the entire case would rely, were instrumental in creating this version of the evidence for history to re-examine and with the same head shaking results.. "No Way".
Everything that was done during Warren was done to cover up ANY of the contradictory evidence to the pre-ordained conclusion. I wonder if Mr Rossi is aware of the following from the 1/27 Exec Committee:
A conclusion written about in the newspapers - the fragment causing the throat wound... does not appear in any medical documentation of the autopsy... there is no "explanation there in the autopsy" at all... the Autopsy describes the SBT conclusions in the face of mountains of contradictory evidence.
One finds numerous examples of "what they first said" not being acceptable... this has to be one of the worst...
Mr. Rankin:
Then theres a great range of material in
regards to the wound and the autopsy and this point of exit
or entrance of the bullet in the front of the neck, and that all
has to be developed much more than we have at the present time.
We have an explanation there in the autopsy that probably
a fragment came out the front of the neck, but with the elevation
the shot must have come from, and the angle, it seems quite apparent,
since we have the picture of where the bullet entered in
the back, that the bullet entered below the shoulder blade to the
right of the backbone, which is below the place where the
picture shows the bullet came out in the neckband of the shirt
in front, and the bullet, according to the autopsy didn't strike
any bone at all, that particular bullet, and go through.
So that how it could turn, and --
Rep. Boggs. I thought I read that bullet just went.in a
finger's length.
Mr. Rankin. That is what they first said
There are only a few men in this story who carry the weight to order Humes/Boswell to do what they did if in fact they did it. If Humes' superior provides a national security reason for ordering the alteration of evidence... I don't think we can fault Humes for anything other than misguided obediance and self-preservation...
The real question is: Does the buck stop at that Admiral - Sponsor or Facilitator? Since once the Best Evidence is gone... that egg cannot be uncracked... who would the top brass of the military be answering to, working for... and were THEY TOO manuevered into a position to do only what they gave thought to previously...
If all the evidence is considered inauthentic... all we have left is the coroborrated word of those who were there... and THEY tell us that JFK was worked upon prior to his official arrival... in fact, while he was supposedly lying in a coffin at the front of the hospital... how that is not an unimpeachable cornerstone to understanding the conspiracy... how the vast difference between Parkland and Bethesda is not plainly and painfully obvious to all...
I simply do not know what is.
DJ
Surely there were those in that autopsy room who shook their collective heads and said "No way it happened like that"... More sinister is the implication that those trusted with producing such a document upon which the entire case would rely, were instrumental in creating this version of the evidence for history to re-examine and with the same head shaking results.. "No Way".
Everything that was done during Warren was done to cover up ANY of the contradictory evidence to the pre-ordained conclusion. I wonder if Mr Rossi is aware of the following from the 1/27 Exec Committee:
A conclusion written about in the newspapers - the fragment causing the throat wound... does not appear in any medical documentation of the autopsy... there is no "explanation there in the autopsy" at all... the Autopsy describes the SBT conclusions in the face of mountains of contradictory evidence.
One finds numerous examples of "what they first said" not being acceptable... this has to be one of the worst...
Mr. Rankin:
Then theres a great range of material in
regards to the wound and the autopsy and this point of exit
or entrance of the bullet in the front of the neck, and that all
has to be developed much more than we have at the present time.
We have an explanation there in the autopsy that probably
a fragment came out the front of the neck, but with the elevation
the shot must have come from, and the angle, it seems quite apparent,
since we have the picture of where the bullet entered in
the back, that the bullet entered below the shoulder blade to the
right of the backbone, which is below the place where the
picture shows the bullet came out in the neckband of the shirt
in front, and the bullet, according to the autopsy didn't strike
any bone at all, that particular bullet, and go through.
So that how it could turn, and --
Rep. Boggs. I thought I read that bullet just went.in a
finger's length.
Mr. Rankin. That is what they first said
There are only a few men in this story who carry the weight to order Humes/Boswell to do what they did if in fact they did it. If Humes' superior provides a national security reason for ordering the alteration of evidence... I don't think we can fault Humes for anything other than misguided obediance and self-preservation...
The real question is: Does the buck stop at that Admiral - Sponsor or Facilitator? Since once the Best Evidence is gone... that egg cannot be uncracked... who would the top brass of the military be answering to, working for... and were THEY TOO manuevered into a position to do only what they gave thought to previously...
If all the evidence is considered inauthentic... all we have left is the coroborrated word of those who were there... and THEY tell us that JFK was worked upon prior to his official arrival... in fact, while he was supposedly lying in a coffin at the front of the hospital... how that is not an unimpeachable cornerstone to understanding the conspiracy... how the vast difference between Parkland and Bethesda is not plainly and painfully obvious to all...
I simply do not know what is.
DJ
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter