20-06-2013, 06:14 PM
I agree Martin about the very long delay accounting for some differences.
But Albert brings up a good point about the weight of the brain not being recorded that night and then later it comes in at 1500 grams. I have a real problem with that and so did Noguchi at the Wecht conference in 2003.
Like many others who have studied Mantik's OD metrics, once you understand the science behind it, IMO it is very hard to deny that work. In fact, one of the best parts of Horne's books is him explaining the science. Because in his earlier days, Mantik had a problem in, let us say, doing "JFK autopsy for Beginners" language.
Now, once you understand all the damage to the brain, and really, someone should map out a chart on this, you see that what all those witnesses saw does not correspond to what the Ida Dox drawing depicts. (Does everyone know that is a false name by the way? Blakey did not want anyone tracking her down. For good reason. She was scripted as to what to depict.)
In my view, the very best part of Horne's books are what Stringer said when he was confronted with the photos of the brain. He said that he did not take those photos and what was in them did not correspond with what he recalled. He was certain he did not take them for two reasons:
1. He never used that kind of film
2. He never used that "press pack" technique. (He could tell both from the etch marks on the film.)
In my view, the case that both the photos of the brain, and the x rays of the skull have been altered is pretty much proven. And it is one of the strongest pieces of evidence we can use for the fiftieth.
Because the logical reason for having done that is to disguise the extensive damage done to the brain, which would seem to imply either: 1) A frangible type bullet, 2.) More than one bullet.
And either of those means conspiracy. But also a high level cover up after the fact.
If you recall, the autopsy used to be the way the WC defenders cinched their case. Today, its one of the most vulnerable parts of their case and one of the best points we have.
But Albert brings up a good point about the weight of the brain not being recorded that night and then later it comes in at 1500 grams. I have a real problem with that and so did Noguchi at the Wecht conference in 2003.
Like many others who have studied Mantik's OD metrics, once you understand the science behind it, IMO it is very hard to deny that work. In fact, one of the best parts of Horne's books is him explaining the science. Because in his earlier days, Mantik had a problem in, let us say, doing "JFK autopsy for Beginners" language.
Now, once you understand all the damage to the brain, and really, someone should map out a chart on this, you see that what all those witnesses saw does not correspond to what the Ida Dox drawing depicts. (Does everyone know that is a false name by the way? Blakey did not want anyone tracking her down. For good reason. She was scripted as to what to depict.)
In my view, the very best part of Horne's books are what Stringer said when he was confronted with the photos of the brain. He said that he did not take those photos and what was in them did not correspond with what he recalled. He was certain he did not take them for two reasons:
1. He never used that kind of film
2. He never used that "press pack" technique. (He could tell both from the etch marks on the film.)
In my view, the case that both the photos of the brain, and the x rays of the skull have been altered is pretty much proven. And it is one of the strongest pieces of evidence we can use for the fiftieth.
Because the logical reason for having done that is to disguise the extensive damage done to the brain, which would seem to imply either: 1) A frangible type bullet, 2.) More than one bullet.
And either of those means conspiracy. But also a high level cover up after the fact.
If you recall, the autopsy used to be the way the WC defenders cinched their case. Today, its one of the most vulnerable parts of their case and one of the best points we have.